Talk:1507 in science

Prod'ing of XXXX in science articles
This article, and 1500 in science, were prod'ed. I object to the deletion, until I see some persuasive arguments that these pages are "unencyclopedic." Maybe a general discussion on the contents of all  in science articles is needed? Awolf002 19:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Too right! I can't remember why I created the article, but I must have spotted some kind of gap in the sequence. The year articles in science are, I think, as well-established as those for the arts. Deb 20:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)