Talk:1891 Cisleithanian legislative election

Requested move 22 February 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre (talk) 01:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

1891 Cisleithanian legislative election → 1891 legislative election in the Empire of Austria (1867–1918) – Per parent Category:Empire of Austria (1867–1918) and per WP:CommonName. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him &#124; talk) 21:12, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose per WP:NC-GAL, the naming convention for election articles. The current title is the correct naming format, and the rationale is somewhat misleading, as although the category is named as such, the main article is Cisleithania. Number   5  7  14:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Elections and Referendums has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him &#124; talk) 21:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Using "Empire of Austria" in this way is confusing and putting two dates in the title is worse. We could do "1891 Austrian legislative election", however. (My opinion is the same on all these RMs that should have been done as a multi-move.) Srnec (talk) 16:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

NOTE: To keep the discussion & arguments being made in this group of RMs from being fractured across multiple talk pages, all future arguments & discussions on this RM should be made at. Arguments already made here are moved there accordingly. Thanks! ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk&#124;contribs) 20:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Note to closer: Consider closing this RM as per the outcome of the discussion at. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk&#124;contribs) 20:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.