Wikipedia:WikiProject Austria/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of the Austria WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Austria related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Austria project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Austria articles by quality and Category:Austria articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

 * How can I get my article rated? : Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
 * Who can assess articles? : Any member of the Austria WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
 * Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? : Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
 * What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
 * Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Quality assessments
After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

Importance assessment
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the WikiProject Austria project banner on its talk page:



The following values may be used for importance assessments:
 * Top - The article is about one of the core topics of Austria. Adds articles to Category:Top-importance Austria articles
 * High - The article is about the most well-known or culturally or historically significant aspects of Austria. Adds articles to Category:High-importance Austria articles
 * Mid - The article is about a topic within the Austria field that may or may not be commonly known outside the Austria community. Adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Austria articles
 * Low - The article is about a topic that is highly specialized within the Austria field and is not generally common knowledge outside the community. Adds articles to Category:Low-importance Austria articles
 * Unknown - Any article which has not yet been assessed on the importance scale is automatically added to the Category:Unknown-importance Austria articles.

Requesting an assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. You can also request an assessment on this page's talk page.

Hi! Somebody has assessed this article (Schloss Eggenberg (Graz)). The entry could maybe removed now, but I dont know what the usual procedure here is. Does anybody know? Best regards, Kmw2700 (talk) 16:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Wrote/translated the article for Schloss Eggenberg (Graz) as well as created some related articles in English, could another member of the project please offer assessments for this article and perhaps the related articles? Thanks! Smf77 (talk) 06:56, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello Austrians, please add Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft to WikiProject Austria and give it an initial assessment. --Marcus      19:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Reichstag (Austria) - new article translated directly from German Wikipedia.


 * Innsbruck Cathedral – I created this article in January 2013 and have expanded it significantly since the initial assessment. Bede735 (talk) 14:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Battle of Vienna - This article is most definitely not start quality. It should be at least a C. Tomh903 (talk) 19:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello there. I've translated the German Article of [|Immofinanz] to english Immofinanz and added some info in the Company infobox. Would be great if someone could check that one out. Thesteiner (talk) 11:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Rosenburg - I rewrote this article to improve the grammar, reading level, format, and references. Please note if it is at a B, C or START level, for I think it's past the STUB phase. I suggest maybe a LOW importance, unless it is known that the tournaments attract many visitors yearly - then MID. LTC (Ret.) David J. Cormier (talk) 18:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Josephine Mutzenbacher needs some assessment, should not be hard as it has been assessed by other projects too. I´d give it a low importance.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 21:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Assessment log

 * The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Popular pages

 * Popular pages: List of top articles with the most frequent views, updated monthly.