Talk:1960 Chinese Mount Everest expedition

Response to O1lI0's tags
You didn't even create a talk page when you added four tags to 1960 Chinese Mount Everest expedition. I make a final response here, one by one:
 * The only real problem I can think of, is the sentence "the international mountaineering community has generally acknowledged the result as more evidence has been revealed". If you have sources in the recent 20 years (Not 1960s or 80s articles, I already know them!) that suggest "mountaineers still mostly believe the report is faked", I'll change that. Now back to your tags:


 * "Factual accuracy is disputed": Disputed by whom, other than you? As for "factual accuracy", if I understand correctly, the expedition's process counts as facts in that article. Which part is inaccurate? If you have a different version, provide it, please.
 * "Original research": Which single detail in my description is not supported by sources?
 * "Extensive bias or disproportional coverage towards one or more specific regions": Yes, I acknowledge that. I had a "extensive bias" towards the Mount Everest region.
 * "Additional citations for verification": Of course, you are free to add if you find any. But it has been one day since you added those tags, and did you even bother to search? Esiymbro (talk) 10:32, 21 December 2017 (UTC) (Moved here from Talk:Mount Everest)

A few corrections needed...
There are a couple of instances in this article that lack clarity due, probably, to mis-translations into English. For example, "a number of evidence" and "17 pm". Can someone who can translate look at the sources and suggest corrections? Sxg169 (talk) 12:44, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * These are indeed mis-translations. I have checked the Chinese language source and "17 pm" should be "5 pm". Thanks for pointing out. Esiymbro (talk) 10:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)