Talk:1970 NBA expansion draft

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=elghAAAAIBAJ&sjid=0YUFAAAAIBAJ&pg=4500,2162510
 * In 1970 NBA Expansion Draft on 2011-05-25 04:08:45, 404 Not Found
 * In 1970 NBA Expansion Draft on 2011-06-06 14:34:27, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 14:34, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 1970 NBA Expansion Draft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101231020552/http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/CLE/leaders_career.html to http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/CLE/leaders_career.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090706072523/http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/garredi01.html to http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/garredi01.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091117111104/http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/s/schluda01.html to http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/s/schluda01.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080116123003/http://www.nba.com/bobcats/news/draft_central_expansion_alltime_results.html to http://www.nba.com/bobcats/news/draft_central_expansion_alltime_results.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:50, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

revert
At this edit, Editor ZooBlazer reverted my edit with the edit summary URL status is necessary.

Not true. dead is not necessary as demonstrated by these examples: In both of these examples, the rendering is exactly the same so dead is necessary when the url in url is dead.
 * with dead:
 * without dead:
 * without dead:
 * without dead:

When the url in url is, is  , is  , then url-status is necessary. Including dead in a cs1|2 template just adds clutter to the wikitext; don't do that.

My edit should be restored primarily because of the reference (permalink) that Editor ZooBlazer rebroke when reverting my edit. As I write this, that reference (permalink) is still broken.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 14:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Trappist the monk The refs are marked dead because they lead to error pages as they are all over 10 years old and things have changed with the links/sites in that time. It makes the archive link the default link instead so people can actually read what the website says. -- Zoo  Blazer  16:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Did you not look at my examples? In both of my examples, Title is linked by //archive.org regardless of the presence or absence of dead; clicking "Title" in the examples takes you to //archive.org.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 17:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Do what you want, but the URL status is just going to get added back eventually by an editor or bot as it's normally a main part of archived refs. -- Zoo  Blazer  17:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok, I did. This time though, I looked at each of the urls that had been marked  .  Some are in fact dead; others are not.  Those that aren't dead, I changed to deviated to indicate that the original source is   but has been changed in some way.
 * And I fixed your broken reference (diff).
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 19:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 19:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)