Talk:1 kilometre

Untitled
If you're going to be renaming articles, wouldn't 1E+3 m make more sense than 1 E 3 m? (Or has this already been discussed somewhere and I didn't notice?) --Brion 21:42 Aug 20, 2002 (PDT)


 * Ahh, plus doesn't work. Well that's annoying. --Brion

What's with all the Scandinavians and their mountains?  -- John Owens 10:45 Mar 28, 2003 (UTC)


 * We like them, since they seem to encourage trolls -- Egil

It might be nice to have a separate pages for elevation, but once we can link geographic coordinates, there may be no need for them. --User:Docu

Some IMO redundant ones

 * 1,609.344 m &mdash; One mile
 * 1,852 m &mdash; One nautical mile
 * Conversions should be done the other way; it would be nice if someone figured out nautical mile and re-added it.
 * 3,410 m &mdash; Height of Piz Linard, highest peak in the Vorarlberg
 * 1,300 m &mdash; Height of Haltitunturi, highest point in Finland
 * 1,344 m &mdash; Height of Ben Nevis, highest point in the United Kingdom
 * 2,038 m &mdash; Height of Mount Mitchell, highest point in eastern North America
 * 2,100 m &mdash; Height of Kebnekaise, highest point in Sweden
 * 2,499 m &mdash; Height of Rysy, highest point in Poland
 * 3,717 m &mdash; Height of Teide, highest point in Spain
 * 3,754 m &mdash; Height of Aoraki/Mount Cook, highest peak in New Zealand
 * 3,776 m &mdash; Height of Mount Fuji, highest peak in Japan
 * 4,808 m &mdash; Height of Mont Blanc, highest peak in Western Europe
 * 5,959 m &mdash; Height of Mount Logan, highest peak in Canada
 * 2,469 m &mdash; Height of Galdhøpiggen, highest point in Norway
 * Only one highest peak per continent please, but, thanks anyway.

As you may have guessed if you've seen any of the other pages where I've done this organizing, if you really care, feel free to re-add any of these. JesseW 23:15, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

All data from same site
It would seem as if all the information on this home page is from the same web page: http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/1-E3-m. I'm not sure what that has to say about credibility, but I guess it's worth thinking about Erufailon42 (talk) 13:03, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Citations template removal
Looks like this article has enough citations, so why keep the old template?Astatine211Talk 18:35, 11 March 2011 (UTC)