Talk:2006 ball-tampering controversy

Atherton? LOL
Quoting Atherton, himself known for being involved in a controversy with the umpires (to put it mildly), is just ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.101.17.102 (talk) 20:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Ball tampering controversy in August 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110629190158/http://www.sportinglife.com/cricket/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=cricket/06/11/04/CRICKET_Hair_Timeline.html to http://www.sportinglife.com/cricket/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=cricket/06/11/04/CRICKET_Hair_Timeline.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 05:39, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Ball tampering controversy in August 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080225060853/http://www.thenews.com.pk:80/print1.asp?id=30722 to http://www.thenews.com.pk/print1.asp?id=30722
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080112002243/http://www.abc.net.au:80/news/newsitems/200702/s1842687.htm to http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200702/s1842687.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 14:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ball tampering controversy in August 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080111151435/http://sport.independent.co.uk/cricket/article1222263.ece to http://sport.independent.co.uk/cricket/article1222263.ece
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050306032958/http://www.sportal.com.au/cricket.asp?i=news to http://www.sportal.com.au/cricket.asp?i=news&id=90732
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sportinglife.com/cricket/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=cricket%2F06%2F11%2F04%2FCRICKET_Hair_Timeline.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 27 March 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 02:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Ball tampering controversy in August 2006 → 2006 ball tampering controversy – More common way these are described. No other ball tampering controversies in 2006 worthy of an individual article (see Ball tampering. AIRcorn (talk) 00:36, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. StAnselm (talk) 04:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Support but amend to more explicit "2006 Pakistani ball-tampering controversy". This pairs with 2018 Australian ball-tampering scandal. Bjenks (talk) 02:49, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * What's the difference between a "controversy" and a "scandal"? StAnselm (talk) 01:18, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't care whether controversy or scandal is used, but this involves much more than Pakistan. You could argue it is also an Australian one given Hairs is front and centre. AIRcorn (talk) 03:31, 30 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Support per nom. It seems to be standard on Wikipedia to put the date first; there's no need to include the month, and I don't think 'Pakistani' is really needed either as there's no ambiguity here. Robofish (talk) 14:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 16 July 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. This also allowed us to merge the page histories after an old old cut-and-paste move that wasn't discovered in the course of the previous request. Dekimasu よ! 03:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

2006 ball tampering controversy → 2006 ball-tampering controversy – As per related discussion at Talk:2018 Australian ball-tampering scandal, in this instance "ball-tampering controversy" is a compound adjective and thus requires a hyphen. For this reason and consistency with the mentioned article, this one should be moved to the hyphenated name. I tried being WP:BOLD but that name has already been used and was redirected to a different location (which I have now changed to here). Spike &#39;em (talk) 11:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Support per nom/previous discussion.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 18:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Support per proper English grammar. Rreagan007 (talk) 18:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Support per previous RM discussion. – Ianblair23 (talk) 23:56, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Support: exactly as the nominator says; it's grammatically correct to include the hyphen. Richard3120 (talk) 17:14, 20 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.