Talk:2015 Belgian Grand Prix

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2015 Belgian Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150902074353/http://www.planetf1.com/driver/55667788/74703/Hakkinen-understands-Vettels-anger to http://www.planetf1.com/driver/55667788/74703/Hakkinen-understands-Vettels-anger

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Kph
Common and acceptable? Tell that to the CGPM. Anyhow, this is a quote from an interview. Do we have proof that Nico actually said kay pee aich and that this isn't just a poor choice of spelling on the journalist's part? 93.136.124.3 (talk) 05:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, common and acceptable. Look at the first line of Kilometers per hour. It may not be the official abbreviation but it is common and acceptable and (not that it matters) but I usually switch between them. Now, it's not a poor choice of spelling but an alternate one and there is no evidence but if you quote, you must quote exactly, what trust that she did and bear in mind that kph is a common vocal abbreviation of kilometer per hour, so I find it probable he said kph. And next time do some research before you declare something "wrong". Not to mention that most people (like me an hour ago) dont know about CGPM and those who do wont necessarily care (like me now) SSSB (talk) 07:26, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Lots of assumptions here. Nico Rosberg is not a native English speaker. In Europe "Kph" is not used outside the UK, if anything he would say "kay em aich" for "km/h". "kph" is only used in a few English speaking countries (I presume, since its mention on the page you linked is unsourced) and is NOT a SI unit, which would be what the remaining 95% of the world uses, and Wikipedia requires. 93.136.124.3 (talk) 16:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Your argument is a list of irrelevant statements. This is a direct quote in quotation marks. He is quoted as saying kph. If the quote stays, kph stays, it's that simply. You can't change a quote to match personal style preference, otherwise it is no longer a quote.
 * On a side note, you can't seriously expect to win any arguement with Do we have proof that Nico actually said kay pee aich and that this isn't just a poor choice of spelling on the journalist's part? as you have nothing to prove this. SSSB (talk) 16:34, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * You have zero proof either for your claims. I at least have some anecdotal evidence, of which you also have none. All you can argue is that somebody's words have been written down and likely mangled by a tabloid journalist and we should leave them to readers to demangle. You have a point, without a recording it would be WP:OR to guess what Nico really said. The only thing I'll insist on is linked "kph" for other readers who might not have seen this spelling. That's sort of why I added it in brackets in the first place. 93.142.89.209 (talk) 00:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Anecdotal evidence? Your anecdotes are not relevant and dont prove anything. Can you prove likely mangled? No, because no evidence exists to suggest this is even close to accurate. If you want to change a quote the onus is on you to prove the quote is wrong, not on me to prove it is right. SSSB (talk) 07:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Anecdotal evidence? Your anecdotes are not relevant and dont prove anything. Can you prove likely mangled? No, because no evidence exists to suggest this is even close to accurate. If you want to change a quote the onus is on you to prove the quote is wrong, not on me to prove it is right. SSSB (talk) 07:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)