Talk:2023 antisemitic riots in the North Caucasus

Requested move 30 October 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: '''Move to 2023 antisemitic riots in the North Caucasus. There is clear and undisputed SNOW support for moving the page, and there is a growing consensus to use "antisemitic" instead of "Anti-Jewish", including by the nominator.  (non-admin closure) ‡ El cid, el campeador'''  talk  18:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

2023 wave of antisemitism in the North Caucasus → 2023 North Caucasus anti-Jewish riots – WP:COMMONNAME, WP:CONCISE. Not so much a "wave" as a multi-day set of riots. "Anti-Jewish riots" seems to be the common phrase used in RS: NYT, Kyiv Independent, Barron's, Haaretz, among others Longhornsg (talk) 15:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Support, more formal and more accurate Unknown-Tree (talk) 15:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Support--— Osama Eid  ( talk ) 16:18, 30 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Support for "2023 antisemitic riots in the North Caucasus", because "antisemitic" is a more established form for "anti-Jewish", and "in the North Caucasus" sounds less confusing than "North Caucasian". what do you think? Triggerhippie4 (talk) 17:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Antisemitic works for me Longhornsg (talk) 17:14, 30 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Support move to 2023 antisemitic riots in Dagestan or 2023 antisemitic riots at Dagestan airport as a preference. --GnocchiFan (talk) 17:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
 * It was not only in Dagestan, but in Kabardino-Balkaria and Karachay-Cherkessia too, as the article shows. Triggerhippie4 (talk) 18:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
 * My apologies. 2023 antisemitic riots in the North Caucasus would probably be best in this case. GnocchiFan (talk) 18:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Support, per User:Unknown-Tree 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 ☎️ 📄
 * Support, as wave shouldn't be in the title. Sahaib (talk) 20:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Support for substituting "Pogroms" instead of "Riots", because "Pogrom" is more established as a term for a violent riot incited specifically with the aim of massacring or expelling an ethnic or religious group. WanukeX (talk) 23:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Support to 2023 Dagestan anti-Semitic riots or something of the like. Jebiguess (talk) 02:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Correction - North Caucasus anti-Semitic riots. Jebiguess (talk) 02:17, 1 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Support as suggested. Cherkessk and Nalchik are not in Dagestan, hence it should remain "North Caucasus". My very best wishes (talk) 02:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Support nom or Triggerhippie's suggestion. Either way, the current title does not work, IMO. DarkSide830 (talk) 15:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Support, but antisemitic is better than anti-Jewish per WP:CONSUB, as the main article is titled antisemitism not anti-Jewishism or anti-Jewish sentiment. —Michael Z. 18:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, agree. "antisemitic" is much better. My very best wishes (talk) 23:13, 31 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Support Antisemitic and Riots as these clearly are. Borgenland (talk) 00:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support Agnostic towards "anti-Jewish" vs "antisemitic", but the vague "wave" should be replaced with the more specific "riots"  Bremps  ...  02:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. I prefer a title with "antisemitic" over "anti-Jewish", but both are better than the current title. HappyWith (talk) 04:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 October 2023
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau condemned the protests as "deeply upsetting".
 * What I think should be changed (format using textdiff):

US presidential spokesperson Adrienne Watson condemned the protests. Increasing condemnation by world leaders https://twitter.com/JustinTrudeau/status/1718811576583499953 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-67258332
 * Why it should be changed:
 * References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

Declan Newton (talk) 18:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)


 * ✅ See diff, which also added the European Commission response. Thank you! GnocchiFan (talk) 19:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC)