Talk:2029

Asteroid impact
"This has caused some people to think that the asteroid will actually make contact with Earth." Removed from the asteroid event due to: No source cited; use of weasel words. Brian Sayrs 01:21, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Six Feet Under
Why is Six Feet Under mentioned here? It is not set in 2029, is it? --El Oscuro 14:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Eclipses
See WT:YEARS for a matter relevant to this page. Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Walt Disney Animation Studios Post-Renaissance Era
Here are 4 Disney regular animated feature films in the Post-Renaissance Era:


 * 1. Hercules (1997)
 * 2. The Emperor's New Groove (2000)
 * 3. Lilo & Stitch (2002)
 * 4. Home on the Range (2004)

Note: Hercules is an original Disney regular animated masterpiece in 1997 to be distributed and presented by Walt Disney Pictures.

Date format
I would like to suggest changing the date format of this article to the DMY format (e.g. 6 June 2020 as opposed to June 6, 2020). The DMY format seems more international and more suitable for a "global" article like. Also DMY simply makes more sense as it goes from smallest to highest.

At the village pump, I've presented a proposal to establish a standard to use DMY in general for all articles about "generic" years. The discussion got kind of messy however, and I'll propaly restart it at some point. In the meantime, I would like it to create consensus about changing 2029 specifically as well as all other nine articles about the 2020s to the DMY format.--Marginataen (talk) 08:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm pasting the same reply at all the 2020s talk page sections on this topic, with the exception of 2023. As of about a month ago, we had a situation in which all generic year articles had a consistent date format. Since both date styles are considered appropriate per the Manual of Style, it's unusual to see such solid consistency. Since I value consistency, I appreciated that rare situation.
 * As of last month, only 2023 was changed via local consensus to be different than the rest. If this proposal passes for this article, it would join a tiny minority of articles that do not match the overall consistent style. I oppose for that reason.
 * I would be fine with all generic year articles changing to consistently use a different style, and that is the proposal on the table at WP:VPR. Currently, it seems we're at the tail end of a pre-RfC discussion with plans to move forward with an RfC in the next week or so. I would much prefer to keep discussing the overarching change rather than have individual discussions at each year article. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:08, 5 December 2023 (UTC)