Talk:20alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase

20alpha hydroxysteriod dehydrogenase is AKR1C1
The paper by Strickler et al. obviously has some flaws. It missed the AKR1C1 as a HSD20A. There is confusion in old an new literature whether HSD20A is a HSD17B2 enzyme or not. If you look into the Strickler paper you will note that the HSD20A activity is only a by-product. The AKR1C1 has a low and therefore significant Km of 0.6 µM which is the lowest of all substances mentioned in the pubmed protein entry Q04828.1. This should be stressed. --B.Kleine (talk) 21:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 18 July 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus - stale discussion  Dr Strauss   talk   09:21, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

20alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase → 20α-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase – Proper styling and to match other steroid-metabolizing enzyme names (e.g., 5α-reductase). Medgirl131 21:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Winged Blades Godric  11:51, 27 July 2017 (UTC)  --Relisting.   Dr Strauss   talk   17:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)  --Relisting. — usernamekiran (talk)   03:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 22:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment - the 5α-reductase case was also requested at WP:RMTR by, and was moved there in October 2016 after 12 years at the old name, so its debatable whether it establishes a precedent or not. I think this should probably be more thoroughly discussed before going further. Thanks &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 22:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree with . Amakuru, is it possible that you could change the status of this "non-controversial" to "under discussion"? Some other page-mover or sys-op might move it directly. This is listed at WP:RM, thats how I found this in first place. (kindly ping me when replying.) — usernamekiran (talk)  22:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi it shouldn't still be listed at WP:RMTR - I cleared it from there about 20 mins ago. It's possible it lingered on the parent WP:RM page a little longer until the cache cleared, but seems to be gone now. Have you refreshed your page? Thanks  &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 22:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Yup, it was the cache issue. It has left the WP:RM without even purging the server cache. :) — usernamekiran (talk)  22:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.