Talk:2 Girls 1 Cup

Requested move

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 03:23, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

2 Girls 1 Cup → Hungry Bitches – This is an article about a film who's trailer has a different name than the actual film. The film is called Hungry Bitches and the trailer, not the film, is called 2 Girls 1 Cup.Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC) Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose. The film is titled "Hungry Bitches", but it is called "2 Girls 1 Cup". Since it's only notable for the popular response to the trailer, the popular name is what we should use. 209.211.131.181 (talk) 12:31, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: The above argument is irrelevant, and should not be included in the discussion.-Qxukhgiels (talk) 22:06, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: The above ad hominem is irrelevant, and should not be included in the discussion. 209.211.131.181 (talk) 01:38, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: You've used some WP:ATADP arguments here which should generally be avoided. According to the article and most sources, if a person says "I'm going to watch 2 Girls 1 Cup," they are probably going to watch the trailer. But if they are going to watch the actual film, they are probably going to say "I'm going to watch Hungry Bitches," to distinguish it from the trailer. The trailer may be more well known than the film, but this article is about the film not the trailer. And the film is unofficially nicknamed "2 Girls 1 Cup" from its trailer, but is most commonly referred to as Hungry Bitches, again, to distinguish it from the trailer. 2 Girls 1 Cup is not the WP:COMMONNAME for the film. Also to point out, the film is notable for more than just the trailer reactions, see WP:NFILM. Qxukhgiels (talk) 20:20, 28 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose – Per WP:Official names. "2 Girls 1 Cup" is by far the most commonly used name, while "Hungry Bitches" seems to never be used. A quick google search shows that the only page about this film that uses the name "Hungry Bitches" is the imdb page. Also, this page is at least as much about the trailer as it is about the film itself, perhaps the article should be rewritten to be about the trailer instead? Were it not for the trailer this film would not meet the notability requirements. - Cake ~ talk  21:45, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Rewriting
Since this article is supposed to be about the trailer, and not the film, I have proposed some modifications. First is the rewriting of the lead section:


 * 2 Girls 1 Cup is a one-minute viral shock video found on the internet. The video is a trailer for the 2007 Brazilian scat-fetish pornographic film Hungry Bitches, produced by MFX Media, and features two women conducting themselves in fetishistic intimate relations, including defecating into a cup, taking turns in what appears to be consuming the excrement, and vomiting into each others' mouths. "Lovers Theme" by Hervé Roy, from the film Delusions of Grandeur, plays throughouts the video.


 * The video became one of the best known shock videos in itself, and for the reactions its graphic content elicited from viewers who had not seen such content before. Around mid-October 2007, video-sharing sites including YouTube were flooded with videos depicting others' reactions to watching the video for the first time. Many other reaction videos have now appeared for similarly shocking and extreme videos.

Note that I have excluded the references. I am also going to add more about the shock videos that originated from this video and cleanup the background section. I'd like to see the opinions of other users before I rewrite the title.Qxukhgiels (talk) 23:57, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

New media reference, unable to edit
Can someone with permission to edit semi-protected pages please add a recent media reference of 2 Girls 1 Cup? Thanks. STO.OTS (talk) 11:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)



In the popular comics XKCD, there is funny Google statistics about "2 girls 1 cup" http://xkcd.com/467/

2015 British television series No Offence is a police procedural comedy-drama shown on Channel 4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Offence
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.103.48.248 (talk) 18:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Series 1 Episode 2 aired 12/05/15: During a police raid on an illegal drugs lab, police officers are exposed to drug vapours and experience significantly altered mental states. Two female (married, lesbian) Armed Response Team members and the lab's ring-leader get the worst exposure.

Transcript of reference:

Where's Tatu?

They were the most exposed apart from the prisoner, but he's been ventilated and he's under armed guard, so we'll give him his day in court, ma'am.

The girls did us all proud.

Yes.

Yeah, I wouldn't go in there if I was you.

They'll be all right, won't they?

''Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. It's just... whatever [drug] this turns out to be, it's got people a bit twisted.''

Have you ever seen Two Girls, One Cup, ma'am?

(Oh.)

''You, you - get in there. Help that nurse... And watch your feet! It's slippy.''

''Well... that went well.''

End transcript.

About the music
Herve Roy made the music used in 2girls1cup, and participated to the music in Desilusions of Grandeur, but I just rewatched Desilusions of Grandeur and the 2girls1cup music is not in it. Someone able to edit this page should correct it.

Why are we including anonymous theories and speculation?
From the "Production" section:

"It is unknown exactly how the graphic scenes in the video were produced. Many people believe that the apparent feces is composed of a mixture of food substances such as chocolate, coffee cream, peanut butter. One theory states that the woman cleaned her bowels before introducing the substance. Her rectum then instantly rejected it, creating the appearance of defecation. Some speculate that the vomit is real, but was regurgitated before reaching the stomach and does not contain any gastric acids. In the video, the majority of the vomit does not enter the mouths. However, some believe that all of these scenes were created with advanced computer graphics.[6]"

The one source is every bit as vague as the above. Nobody's on the record about this. It's purely speculation. --Ben Culture (talk) 03:47, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 August 2017
I want to edit the impact section of this article. I also want to make a section about 2girls1cup.com Braden7701 (talk) 16:57, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Why Is Release Date Set in the American Way?
A film from any country in South America and Europe seems to always have DD-MM-YYYY as the main layout. Since this movie or trailer for a proper term originated from Brazil, the releasing date shouldn't be written in the American style.

It should've been written like this: 5 January 2007 NOT January 5, 2007. Seriously, it didn't come from the States.

End of conversation,

67.81.163.178 (talk) 23:20, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – Þjarkur (talk) 13:21, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * U.S. Marines watch "2 Girls, 1 Cup".webm

Semi-protected edit request on 29 December 2020
Ira Isaacs was the one in court Norenberg (talk) 04:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Sam Sailor 20:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Reaction by Stewie on Family_Guy TV show episode.
FWIW It would be nice if an editor cited under "Media recognition" that Brian the dog makes Stewie watch this video, for example in this clip at URL:: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmjmcvWGIvk jrodor 10:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrodor (talk • contribs)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 July 2022
Remove 3 orangutans 1 blender from #Impact Hmquam (talk) 00:16, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I removed that whole unsourced section. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:29, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

The Help (2011)
Did 2 Girls 1 Cup perhaps indirectly influenced The Help? A big plot twist in The Help is that Octavia Spencer's character defecates on a pie and feeds it to a racist socialite. The Help was made around the time 2 Girls 1 Cup was making the internet rounds. One can't help but wonder whether the 2 Girls 1 Cup phenomenon may have contributed to this idea. I wonder if the filmmakers heard or maybe even seen 2 Girls 1 Cup, and then came up with this idea. I don't think the poop pie was in the novel the movie based on so I think it was the filmmakers' idea and they may have been inspired by 2 Girls 1 Cup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.72.3.79 (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * We would need a source to verify this, otherwise it's just speculation. Richard75 (talk) 14:49, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 July 2023
We were watching this way before 2007 the date is wrong I’m thinking 2003 2002 this came out 216.255.62.7 (talk) 11:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Kpg  jhp  jm  13:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Does this trash really needs an own article?
Seriously. 62.226.86.149 (talk) 23:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC)


 * cup? more like cup holder on cars!
 * hb? more like swiss plane registration! 2404:8000:1027:2C72:4575:92AD:6955:37B6 (talk) 04:00, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Edit lockability
Please make this page unlocked and be edited freely by any type of editors because it no longer troublesome. 2404:8000:1027:2C72:79E5:8844:E9C9:BDA6 (talk) 02:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Legality
So this "movie" is legal in Brazil but illegal in the U.S.? Despite the first amendment? Weird. What's the legal status in U.K., Canada, Ireland, Australia and New Zealand? 2A02:8071:62F1:19A0:6883:CD1D:9A37:2225 (talk) 00:02, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

This short film definitely came out earlier than 2007
We had this movie uploaded to our file sharing servers in 1999 at least 8 years earlier. 2603:6080:7E01:A02:9AC:70A:D43A:F814 (talk) 07:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 November 2023
"leading some in the media to incorrectly believe"

Grammar/ split infinitive. Please edit to

"leading some in the media to believe incorrectly...“

Thank you 99.53.199.9 (talk) 02:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: Split infinitives are not ungrammatical, and the change is not an improvement to the sentence flow. Tollens (talk) 03:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Rename the article "hungry bitches"
This is after all the original name of the movie and would be more appropriate as a formal name. You don't see other movies being called by their nicknames in the title of wikipedia articles, by the same logic this shouldnt either One consideration is that most people would know this as "2 girls 1 cup" and this article would no longer appear on google searches for "2 girls 1 cup" if it was to be renamed. Can any SEO experts leave their thoughts on if this would be a problem or nah? 2A00:23CC:B589:EF01:3997:E50B:3BCB:4F30 (talk) 11:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit request
Please change "best known" to "best-known" in the lead, as ungrammatical. Thanks. 2.97.66.187 (talk) 20:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ M.Bitton (talk) 16:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)