Talk:ANSI ASC X9.95 Standard

= Advertising for Certichron's services? =

Untitled
It appears User:Tglassy added a couple links to promote his services (diff) - a link to his company's web site and a link to an article that expresses his opinion about the legality of GPS timestamps. (The title of the link is misleading - it sounds like a court ruled that they were inadmissible, where it's really just his opinion.) I appreciate that he made other improvements to the article, but this feels like it is not a neutral point-of-view. Crouchingturbo (talk) 01:26, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on ANSI ASC X9.95 Standard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206014938/http://www.x9.org:80/news/pr050701 to http://www.x9.org/news/pr050701
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061231231549/http://www.rsasecurity.com:80/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2347 to http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2347

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)