Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Computing. This project aims to assess articles under the scope of WikiProject Computing and help improving Wikipedia.

Assessment requests
If you have encountered an article that you believe has been sufficiently improved, please list it here and, if possible, a reviewer will reassess the article and leave comments.

Quality assessment procedures

 * Until an article meets good article criteria and passes good article nomination, it can be reassessed according to the quality criteria to Stub-, Start-, C-, or B-Class. This can be done for improvement or decline, by any editor.
 * To promote an article to GA-class, the article must pass review as a good article nominee. To demote an article from GA-class to B-class or below, the article must undergo good article reassessment.
 * To promote an article to A-class, the article must undergo review on the talk page.
 * To promote an article to FA-class, the article must pass review as a featured article candidate. To demote an article from FA-class, the article must undergo featured article review.

Open requests
Some articles are of interest for both this project and WikiProject Computer Security. While assessing, please update both projects Quality and Importance, if you can.


 * 1)  — requested by  03:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 2)  requested by  have spent some considerable time updating it, correcting some serious *industry-wide* misassertions (yes, really, not "mistakes by other wikipedia editors", actual misleading misassertions by major processor manufacturers). i'm also recommending that the page be upgraded to "Top" or, at a push, "high", because Vector processing is over 60 years old and is the core fundamental basis of all GPUs on the planet and the majority of supercomputers as well. in talk page. Lkcl (talk) 17:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * holy cow! 477 pages link to this one! Lkcl (talk) 18:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * also having read the critera i would advocate it seems to meet the criteria for a "B" class. i don't think it meets "GA" or "A" criteria. Lkcl (talk) 18:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I have some concerns with the direction this article has taken. I have started a discussion at Talk:Vector_processor. ~Kvng (talk) 14:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  — requested by : I created the article this August and expanded it significantly since then. It has not been assessed. Quality B. Default importance rating, Low seems like a good place to start, can be adjusted for other projects as necessary. ~Kvng (talk) 14:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 2)  — requested by : I created the article a couple of days ago. It has not been assessed. Another B. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 14:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Transcluded requests
The following list is transcluded from WikiProject Computer Security/Assessment of the related project WikiProject Computer Security, that recently has created the Assessment department.

You can join that department, if you like, here.

Please, review them and update the transcluded page accordingly.

Recent assessment changes

 * Daily list of assessment changes across the project

How to assess an article
Anyone can assess a listed article.
 * Study the quality guidelines. Carefully determine which class applies.
 * Leave comments about your assessment on the talk page.
 * Edit the  parameter on each relevant project banner.
 * to remove the request.
 * Include in the edit summary e.g.:

Quality statistics
The statistics below are from the last time the assessment tool scanned the WikiProject Computing articles. To see the latest results, have the assessment tool update the data, then reload this page.

Project participants interested in assessment

 * 1) --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 15:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Phillip A (talk)
 * 3)  SOL Basic  00:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) -- Logical Premise Ergo? 13:46, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Some Old Man (talk) 11:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 6)  C 21 K talk  14:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 7)  14:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 8)  11:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) Andy Chat c 22:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) --Michaelkourlas (talk) 22:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 7:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 14:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) &sect; Music Sorter &sect;  (talk) 06:37, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 3)  --Kvng (talk) 21:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Nullw0rm (Talk? - Contribs?) 18:45, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Dexp (talk) 13:58, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) --Pastore Italy (talk) 17:37, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) Pnm (talk) 18:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) Jamesrules90 (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) – ebraminiotalk 17:32, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) Enfcer (talk) 00:40, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) Ankit Maity (talk)  06:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) --Ourhistory153 (talk) 14:56, 11 November 2011 (UTC) Cloud_computing
 * 13) Bardi1100 (talk)
 * 14) Diego (talk) 09:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) -- Trevj (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) Simon Bramfitt talk
 * 17) Enrique Villar 13:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC) (St. Paul's Fall)
 * 18) Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 08:10, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * 19) MBlairMartin (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2016
 * 20) Jamesp88 (talk | contribs) 17:50, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 21) OvalCheese (talk) 00:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 22) Lkcl (talk) 11:20, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 23) ClockworkSoul 17:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 24) –  Gluonz  talk contribs 21:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) ClockworkSoul 17:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) –  Gluonz  talk contribs 21:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)