Talk:Acem Meditation

Article should conform to WP:MEDRS
Wikipedia has continued to raise the standard for sourcing of medical-related articles, with the guideline specifying that individual studies are considered to be primary sources, and that research reviews, which are secondary sources, are preferred. Or even required. Ideally this article would cite research reviews. TimidGuy (talk) 15:21, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Reads like an ad?
This article reads a lot like a ad for ACEM rather than a objective article on it! The research bit seems very biased in favour of ACEM, repeating single positive studies. 51.174.232.16 (talk) 10:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)