Talk:Agha Mustafa Hassan

WP:OR
Have you even checked out those citations? They're not backing up any claims at all. They're basically just WP:OR! — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 20:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Saqib, I am sorry I had lost track.
 * Also, given the tone of your question, I considered not replying, to be honest. The sources used did not mention the actor, maybe, but proved the film existed or explained what it was, so not the best sources, maybe not even NEEDED ref, nor useful, but not OR; feel free to add better sources, sure.
 * Here too, I reverted your removal. Punctual unsourced statements and original research are two different issues imv. The roles are easily verifiable. If you think something is unsourced, adding the tag Template:Reference Needed or other of the kind or Failed verification/Not in source seems more appropriate than removing something that is easily verifiable. Or at least use this template. So, yes, I had checked and no, this is not "basically OR", and no, the removal was not appropriate. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank)  10:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Mushy Yank, But WP:NOREX says unsupported assertions = original research. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 10:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * OK, then, it's original research. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  10:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)