Talk:Aijaz Ahmad

Opinion or Original Research
The last paragraph is original research. There is no citation or support. I am removing it for now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.245.35.5 (talk) 20:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Ahmad as a Historian
Certainly in In Theory he works as a historian and his critical engagement with/against post-moderism and the Subaltern Studie group merits, in my opinion, his inclusion in the category of Indian historians. I think he should have a category more specific than just "Indian People", which is far too vague. If anyone one has other better or complementary ideas for categories, we can discuss them here. Inter lingua talk 02:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Probably is the most engaging
that cheapens the article....He's amazing, but come one...it cheapens it

Removed personal opinion
The article had one sentence of fulsome praise for Aijaz Ahmad; I removed it. WP cannot take any position on the truth or falsity of his ideas, on his intelligence or lack thereof. If someone wants to quote a reliable source as to his importance, please do. Zora 07:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Defective link
The link for "Islam, Islamisms and the West" doesn't work anymore"EUnderwood (talk) 07:29, 24 October 2017 (UTC)