Talk:Aircraft ordnance

Move request

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was not moved. --BDD (talk) 19:35, 21 September 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Aircraft ordnance → ordnance –

Requesting move to ordnance, as that term is simpler and in common use. 70.247.162.84 (talk) 15:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose "ordnance" is not restricted to aircraft ordnance, your move request implies that aircraft ordnance is the only type of ordnance. Further ordnance exists as an article, and I see no point in deleting it for this article. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 20:11, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose for the reasons given above.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose - existing article, not the primary topic and the disambiguation needed for this particular usage of the term.GraemeLeggett (talk) 22:29, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose - They are not the same subject. - Ahunt (talk) 23:56, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose For the same reasons. I'm only piling on because I wonder if the user who made this suggestion really meant what they said.  Do they want the sparse content of this article merged into Weapons, since Ordnance is a disambiguation page?  --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:35, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose per all above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * oppose Suggested name would imply non-aircraft ordnance too. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:09, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aircraft ordnance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140105033728/http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=3228 to http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=3228

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)