Talk:Allison Fisher

YouTube links
This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally. Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 04:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It does not appear to me that it is being used as a source; it appears in the "External links" section as a link to additional material of reader interest. The article didn't even have a "References" section until I added one a few minutes ago after adding some sourced details.  All that said, I'm entirely neutral on whether the YouTube link in question is of sufficient usefulness and interest to readers that it will survive further analysis under WP:EL.  I'm just addressing the #1 concern above. No idea as to #2 either - it could well be a copyvio, or it could be fair use at YouTube under US copyright law. —  SMcCandlish  &#91;talk&#93; &#91;cont&#93;  ‹(-¿-)› 12:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hadlow
OR time, I know for a fact that AF comes from Hadlow, but I can't find a RS online to verify the fact. Are there any other editors who can supply this info? Mjroots (talk) 18:20, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I've found a RS to verify this - Kent & Sussex Courier. I've added AF to the Hadlow article, and the Category:Hadlow to this article. Not sure how to incorporate the info here though. Article seems to be lacking structure which makes it harder to know where stuff should go. Mjroots (talk) 09:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Source for pool
The Three Brit Ladies With The Three C's from AZBilliards could be a useful source. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)