Talk:Alpha 2000

Merger proposal

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a merge proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus The Bushranger One ping only 05:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

The article Robin 2160 appears to be a poor quality dupilcate of part of this page.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC) Agree with merger proposal - same basic design of aircraft, different name. Aircraft which have multiple articles (C130 / C130J for example) tend to have huge articles, not stubs. Problems - should it also be merged with earlier Robin types? Which name would you use - first name for the type or last? Winstonwolfe (talk) 07:19, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge - but under the Robin titles until production exceeds that of the originals at least. The convention is article titles should reflect the common usage names, which Alpha aviation 2000 certainly isn't. Nothing that a re-direct can't put right though. Apart from that the Al[pha aviation articles are verging on self promotion and/or advertising.Petebutt (talk) 21:53, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Just to re-iterate my points Alpha aviation has gone bust, so definitely revert to Robin titles!!!!!!!!!!!Petebutt (talk) 21:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a merge proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.