Talk:Amalgamated Bank

NYT story
Owned by Union, Amalgamated Bank Gives Lift to the Left, By NICHOLAS CONFESSORE, AUG. 29, 2015 --Nbauman (talk) 21:49, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

format & contents
I see my removal of the list of clients was challenged. I know very well indeed the historical (and current) significance of the bank, but it nonetheless needs a WP article that shows the information in an objective fashion without looking as if it is promotional. In general, displaying a list of clients at a bank article would be considered very highly promotional, but there might be cases where there is sufficient of a special relationship to include one or more. It could be argued that the labor and liberal organization that are principal clients are indeed in such a relationship (if I wanted to be nit-picky, I could say we need a third-party source that these are not only clients but significant clients--otherwise it might be considered cherry-picking those clients that happen to be labor or progressive in order to make a point--after all, there are many other labor unions--where do they bank?). I've chosen a more compact display--perhaps it will do better.  DGG ( talk ) 00:03, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * DGG – thank you. inspired by your response, i'm doing some further research and adding some more details with citations.  thank you again  Aboudaqn (talk) 15:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)