Talk:American Outdoor Brands

Comment
Forgive me for not being familiar with wiki conventions. User Springee feels that the reason for this company's rebranding is not relevant. I disagree, and I find their agenda to be transparent. This encyclopedia will be more useful to society if it provides information about why things happen. Sipos111 (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC)


 * It's one thing to neutrally say why the company made this choice. It's quite another to use a recent, accusatory article to that end.  The MF article is reasonable but the connection to the recent shooting isn't.  Since you jointed today and have displayed WP:SPA behavior it's not surprising people wouldn't give your edits the benefit of the doubt.  Springee (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Ok. I actually see your point now. And I admit I was not behaving in a constructive manner yesterday. Thoughts about putting the mf article piece back in? Sipos111 (talk) 15:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Go ahead and make some changes. Worst case we can revert.  So long as the language and source are neutral I don't see any issue with the change.  Infact it would be an improvement since currently the article is a stub that doesn't explain why the company wants to do this.  Certainly issolating the stock from the swings associated with gun sales it part of it but I also got the feeling some of the change was because they want to do more things that aren't S&W branded.  Springee (talk) 17:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * If you don't mind, I'd rather you make whatever change you feel is appropriate. What I learned yesterday is that this is something I don't currently have the capacity to get involved with. Sipos111 (talk) 18:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Based on what you have said today and our conversation here I think you do. You are engaged in the talk page in a perfectly level headed fashion.  Yes, we might not agree with what ever changes you try but since we have a working dialog that's OK.  I can try to get to the edits but it will be later (maybe tonight, not sure).  This would be a good chance for you to try to learn the ropes after a bumpy start.  I'm sure we will continue to disagree on some of this but so long as we are both editing in good faith I don't see a problem.  Springee (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Why no listing or links to the wikipedia pages and/or homepages of the 18 brands of American Outdoors? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A03F:8B1A:9500:BC39:B66B:8BD:CE86 (talk) 09:51, 1 March 2023 (UTC)