Talk:Anett Kontaveit

Performance on WTA Tour
There really is no need to document the result of every single tournament a player plays like on Elise Mertens page. Especially for players like these who are not going deep on every tournament. Eventually these tables will get too big and messy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeneM18 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

What is that "SR"? --Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Strike Rate (tournaments won/tournaments competed) check WikiProject Tennis for such questions. -Klõps (talk) 18:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The artice should atleast explain what does it mean. But in this case it does not look necessary when it's just a row of zeros. --Pelmeen10 (talk) 18:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Since "strike rate" is not a common term, it has now been added to the required key. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Consensus on "performance timelines"?
I support adding this. Looks like so are and. But is against, any more opinions? I'm not sure if it should start from 2013 though. --Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:49, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * thank you for your support. I don't see any problem with showing performance of any player on some tournaments, especially when a lot of players have these "Performance timelines table". Anett Kontaveit is rising star in tennis, and for me is really interesting to see how she is progressing in tennis. For example, last two years she made at least quarterfinal at Rome, Italy, she is seeded player on grand slams, she has triumph against big names and etc. So far, it's bit trivial cuz she is still young, but there are a lot of other player's statistics that have more absents in tables than Anett. For me, it's meaningless to have fight against, but it's ok if you think it's trivial, but for some others users it's intresting to see. I made Anett Kontaveit career statistics so there will be detailed carrer of Anett, and on main page only Grand Slam performance.
 * Talking about before 2013, I didn't find that Anett participated at any of Grand Slam or Premier 5/Mandatory tournament, so I think it's pointless to make statictics before 2013.


 * I think when a player makes multiple quarterfinals at tier 1 events there should not be any problem in adding those events to the Preformance table. The year should start from the first year they participated in either a slam or tier 1 event GeneM18 (talk) 19:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * These belong to career statistics article. No need to add long tables full of mistakes (as it was!). and other people have to clean up and fix it after you. --Klõps (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Per Tennis project, having a Grand Slam tournament performance timeline on the main page is standard for all players who have played in one. Having additional tournaments in the timeline is fine but not if the player also has a career statistics article. Those additional tournaments would then be placed in the career statistics article only and the main page would only list the Grand Slam tournaments. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree with everything you said. That's why I made Anett Kontaveit career statistics. I really hope so that we all made a deal :D – JamesAndersoon (talk)

This article says "turned pro: 2010", but her statistics' page "professional debut in 2012". So which is it? I don't how is that decided, according to wtatennis.com she played her first ITF event in 2010 and first WTA qualif in 2012. --Pelmeen10 (talk) 21:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It can be pretty ambiguous that's for sure. You can play pro events but not take the prize money and therefore stay amateur. It does look like she was playing pro events in 2010 though and I found some sources that confirm that. I would say 2012 is incorrect. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I wrote that she debut in 2012 but someone change it to 2010. But actually she debut in 2013 at Miami Open. On official wta site [TENNIS], in 2010, 2011,2012 she played only ITF tournaments. On professional level, she debut in 2013 (She played some professional tournaments in 2012 but in qualifications, so I think that's didn't count, cuz she didn't qualify for main draw. – JamesAndersoon (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:31, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, that's the confusion. The ITF is professional tennis. It may be the minor leagues for lesser players, but it is still a paying professional sport. Fyunck(click) (talk) 16:42, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Oooh. Sorry, my mistake. I thought it's categorised as amateur tournaments, and WTA Tour is professional. Thank you – JamesAndersoon (talk) 21:45, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem... I can see why there would be confusion on that. Cheers. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)