Talk:Angelica Jade Bastién

Self-promotion / Notability concern
None of the language present connotes any kind of notability. Furthermore, the tone with which this article is written suggests self-promotion. There are references to her current output at Vulture and a Twitter page that, as of this writing, does not exist. 6 of the 23 sources provided are just her writing. The act of writing, as well as the fact of being employed as a staff writer, is not itself notable. My proposal is to delete this page, but I would like to know if others perceive this to be too drastic.

Staceyt04 (talk) 22:48, 30 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, I agree. There are scores of film critics who are at least as well known as this one who do not have Wikipedia pages. I feel this page should be deleted. WarrenWilliam (talk) 22:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Nominated article for deletion.
As mentioned in reply to Staceyt04, I don't believe this person merits a Wikipedia page. There are scores of film critics who are as well known, who do not have their own Wikipedia pages. Wikipedia pages for film critics should only exist when it comes to ones like Pauline Kael, Roger Ebert etc. WarrenWilliam (talk) 22:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)