Talk:Animal welfare in Egypt

Blacklisted Links Found on Animal welfare in Egypt
Cyberbot II has detected links on Animal welfare in Egypt which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * https://www.change.org/p/government-of-egypt-stop-poisoning-and-shooting-stray-animals
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Neutrality - WP:NPOV
The article reads like a campaign site for animal welfare. While I sympathize with those issues, it needs to use more neutral language. Statements like "Animal welfare in Egypt is an underrated issue." (unsourced) and the first sentence in "Issues" are unbalanced and don't maintain an uninvolved, encyclopedic tone. Sections like "Stray animal culling" need to state opposite points of view as well (why killing of stray animals may be seen as necessary by officials and citizens). The section "The Ahram Street dog" looks like an example, that is given undue WP:WEIGHT within the whole topic. The section "Activism" is an indiscriminate list of all possible organizations, it would be better to focus only on the most notable ones that have national influence. See WP:NOTADVOCATE for more information. GermanJoe (talk) 13:57, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I have removed list entries without independent, third-party sources to establish their relevance; indiscriminate lists are discouraged. The article still needs more work regarding uninvolved language and the presentation of all relevant viewpoints. GermanJoe (talk) 11:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)