Talk:Anna May Wong

significance of Jan 22
Why did she get a doodle on Jan 22? --2607:FEA8:D5DF:F945:EC2A:FDE3:9E53:A19B (talk) 03:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

1945 film success
A section title mentions "1945 film success", but nothing whatsoever in the article mentions it again, let alone elaborates on it. 2601:80:4200:F51:E8C4:A6F5:85C9:DC8A (talk) 04:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

FA sweeps
The lead does not meet MOS:LEAD and there are sourcing issues. I'm not convinced that news articles from the 1930s are high-quality reliable sources when there are a ton of scholarly sources out there. Article can't be considered well-researched given that it doesn't incorporate the new 2019 scholarly biography by Shirley Jennifer Lim. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  20:00, 7 May 2022

Infobox photo
Does anyone else object to the current infobox photo? I think it's probably the worst one of her in Wikimedia Commons, and shouldn't be the first-up image in the article. I propose replacing it with another. Almost any would be better, but personally I would favour this one: Any comments, support, objections? Masato.harada (talk) 12:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Was Wong born to first or second generation immigrants?
The lead has "Born in Los Angeles to first-generation Taishanese Chinese American parents..." whereas Biography (early life subsection) has: "Wong's parents were second-generation Chinese Americans; her maternal and paternal grandparents had arrived in the U.S. no later than 1855."

Unless I'm missing something, these statements can't both be correct. Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 20:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The lead is wrong. I've fixed it. Masato.harada (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 09:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)