Talk:Armando Gutierrez

Indictment Controversy
Really? So this individual is considered notable because he got mixed up with another person of the same name in a newspaper article? I don't think this section is worthy of inclusion into this article. talk 15:41, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I question your addition of the puffery tag to that section. What wording is an exaggeration or puffery? Most of the section about the subject is an attributed direct quote. Please justify which part you feel is an exaggeration, or remove the tag. As for inclusion, since the story involves news coverage in Taxas, Florida, and New Mexico, it is clearly a notable event.  Jim Miller  See me 15:51, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no story. Your story is that a newspaper screwed up, wrote a story about a different Armando Gutierrez, and then mistakenly attributed it to this Armando Gutierrez.  That, on its own, is not notable or encyclopedic.  Was there a subsequent lawsuit or scandal that resulted from this newspaper article that would make it even minimally notable?  It also speaks volumes that the best source for Gutierrez's accomplishments you can find is a newspaper retraction.  I didn't add the puffery tag for exaggerated wording, I added it because you're trying to prove the Gutierrez's notability by describing a non-notable event that didn't even involve him (or at the very most, only coincidentally involved him).  If this person is as notable as you contend they are, it should be easy to find real sources about Gutierrez (not mistaken identity retractions) that tell us which political candidates he was consulting for, what offices they were running for, and why he played such an important role.    talk 18:57, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem then. The fact that another paper reprinted the retraction strikes me as something rare enough to be considered notable itself, but we can certainly disagree on that.  Jim Miller  See me 19:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Any newspaper that ran the first story with the mistaken identity would have it in their best interests to print a retraction. That's not a rare event nor is it unexpected or unusual in any way.    talk 19:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Criticism
If anyone has criticism of this person to post please make sure it complies with WP:BLP. Thanks.  Blue Rasberry  23:41, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Armando Gutierrez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080421230056/http://enespanol.discovery.com:80/sitiofan/elian-gonzalez/elian-gonzalez.html to http://enespanol.discovery.com/sitiofan/elian-gonzalez/elian-gonzalez.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)