Talk:Artificial intelligence content detection

Article title
Hi. Ideally, the title of the Wikipedia article should correspond to an expression that is commonly used or that people would intuitively search for. My impression is that it is not so much the case with the title "Artificial intelligence detection software". A search on Google seems to return other formulations like "AI detection", "AI detector", "AI content detection", "AI content detector" or "AI detection tool". Do you think we should keep the current title, or does one of these alternative names seem better ? Alenoach (talk) 01:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi there, thanks for taking an interest in this article. As the article creator, I admit I struggled with what to call this, and I've no objections if you wish to move this article to a more recognisable title. GnocchiFan (talk) 09:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 6 November 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Artificial intelligence content detection. Discussion arrived at a consensus to move to Artificial intelligence content detection, due to MOS:ACROTITLE and an consensus to focus on the more general concept than on the tools. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 10:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Artificial intelligence detection software → AI content detector – Per the above discussion on the talk page, this may be a more common term, while also being encyclopedic and not promoting a particular detection software. Seeking user input; as the article creator, I'm unsure what to name this article. GnocchiFan (talk) 17:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, Gnnochi, yes the other user makes a good point; the accessibility of this piece is important.
 * As a contributor to your page, I must say that while the original title does sound more formal, I am in favor of the change. Comintell (talk) 22:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 07:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I personally have a slight preference for "AI content detection" over "AI content detector", because it's maybe better to focus on the more general concept than on the tools that apply that concept (I don't know if this explanation makes sense). But both names are ok.
 * Once renamed, we can make redirects from the other alternative names to the new main title, which should increase the visibility of your article. Alenoach (talk) 12:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * That makes sense, and I tend to agree with you on this. Thanks for the constructive feedback; I really appreciate it! 🙂 GnocchiFan (talk) 17:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Mostly Support - I'm onboard with replacing detection software with content detector or content detection and prefer the latter. I don't think we should replace Artificial intelligence with AI because of MOS:ACROTITLE and because this particular acronym looks ambiguous in many fonts (could be mistaken for diminutive of Albert). ~Kvng (talk) 14:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Support move to Artificial intelligence content detector and oppose move to AI content detector. I think that the proposed "content detector" is an improvement over the current title, but I also don't think that MOS:ACROTITLE would guide us towards abbreviating "AI" here. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 01:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Accident detection system using mobile phone
@ 210.212.100.85 (talk) 18:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)