Talk:Ashita no Nadja

Recessive genes
Does Nadja have them?

If your talking about her hair and eyes, yes. But does it matter? :/ --24.96.182.77 (talk) 22:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Reduced? Why?
I realized that the introduction of the article was reduced and I can't see any reasons written in this talk. Unless the user explains those reasons, I'm afraid to think that the article was vandalized —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.71.186.241 (talk) 00:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Because no one answered (that IP user was me before I registered), I added back the info, . . . in part :) Twicemost 05:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I removed the info you (re)added - it is all about the Spanish and Portuguese dub in Latin America - this info should go in the Spanish and Portuguese wikis, not the English wiki, which tries to focus on the English dub + original series. Ninja neko 16:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I accept, but why then there is info about the Japanese broadcast? Shouldn't that go to the Japanese wiki? Twicemost 03:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The Japanese version is the original series, so that's covered too. Broadcast of foreign languages is still mentioned in the infobox btw, it's just not advised to include the details in the article itself. Ninja neko 07:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Touché :( Well . . . . then I will add at least a Mexican flag in the infobox (altough I'm form Venezuela). Thanks for the suggestion, and have a happy day. Twicemost 01:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

A Merge Proposal and general clean up
I cleaned up the article for an overly long plot summery of the first episode. I expanded it and also stressed it's a fictional story by talking about the series and deleted the opinions about the events within. I also cleaned up the lead by making the manga first and the anime second in compliance to AMP rules. (Which ever comes first, gets to go first in the lead).

I also suggest strongly that the character list be reintroduced and cleaned up into this article. There isn't enough justification for it to getting its own article. Objections?--Hitsuji Kinno (talk) 15:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Manga
Okay look, I don't exactly know why ANN stated Ashita no Nadja has seven volumes published, but the official Nakayoshi website says that there are two, and I have both. There are only two volumes (many characters were cut out and given lesser roles, including Keith, other things were cut out for the storyline to move faster), and I have proof it you want. Kiseki-chi (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Manga run
Though I'm not exactly sure when the manga ran, the end of the first volume says that it was published March 2003-August 2003. Volume 1 was published on September 5, 2003.

Is it really April? Or was it just the April issue (published in March)?

The second volume says that those chapters were published from September 2003-February 2004. The volume itself was first published on February 6, 2004.

Kiseki-chi (talk) 07:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Romance
It says in this article this is a 'romance manga'? While I agree romance is certainly involved (and in a broader concept than personal relationships), I'm wondering how it was decided this would be the central theme. Isn't it just as much about adventure, dancing, positivism, adversity, and non-conformity? I don't see what romance stands above these other parts. DB (talk) 07:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Ashita no Nadja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041113052717/http://www.toei-anim.co.jp:80/english/catalog/nadja/nadja.html to http://www.toei-anim.co.jp/english/catalog/nadja/nadja.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:51, 19 October 2016 (UTC)