Talk:Ashley Moody

Capitalization
Note "the Florida attorney general" is uncapitalized because "attorney general" is preceded by modifiers "the" and "Florida", per MOS:JOBTITLES bullet 3 and table column 2, example 5: "Mao met with American president Richard Nixon in 1972." Any proposal for modification to the guideline should be posted at its talk page, WT:MOSBIO. — Eyer (If you reply, add   to your message to let me know.) 14:02, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

No evidence of fraud in 2020
The text must say that there no evidence of fraud in the 2020 election. If someone wants to throw out the results of an election due to massive fraud, then we have to clarify that there was no evidence of massive fraud, just as RS do and as we're required to by WP:FRINGE. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:58, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I agree and have restored the content, for the reasons you state and for the reasons cited in my edit summary. Neutralitytalk 20:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I was just adjusting the wording in that paragraph since that paragraph is really awkwardly written in its current state. I'll make sure the word fraud is mentioned next time. Curbon7 (talk) 00:47, 19 December 2020 (UTC)


 * There. Adjusted it while still maintaining emphasis on the phrases "no evidence of fraud" and "disproven claims." Curbon7 (talk) 00:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Moody took a leading role in Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 election
Her support for him didn't just involve campaign surrogacy, but aiding him as he refused to concede the election while making false claims of fraud. As the Tampa Bay Times writes, "Moody has also taken a leading role in Trump’s legal fight to overturn the election." This edit should be reverted because it makes her just seem like a Trump 2020 campaign supporter. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 05:27, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , noting that I saw this; I'll do a fix in a bit, little busy at the moment. Curbon7 (talk) 05:52, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , re-added with slightly different wording to put the focus specifically on her role in TX v. PA, rather than just the vague statement of "leading role" which can mean anything without context; the latter runs the risk of being a WP:BLP issue, so best to have it be as clear as possible. Curbon7 (talk) 06:33, 9 August 2021 (UTC)