User talk:Curbon7

= November 2023 =

The Signpost: 6 November 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Mary Woffington

 * My favorite copyeditor! Curbon7 (talk) 00:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Aww shucks, Curbon7 ... *blushes* ... I hope this one maintains the standard you expect of me. :) Cheers,  Baffle☿gab  02:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * One thing I'm unsure of is Mary's father's name; the article had "Arthur/John Woffington"; I read the slash as denoting uncertainty about the first name so I've left "Arthur or John Woffington" in the article, though it might be "Arthur John Woffington" with the slash being a typo. Anyway' I'm sure you'll correct it! :) Cheers,  Baffle☿gab  02:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes that is correct, several equally reliable sources conflict on what her father's name is. Curbon7 (talk) 03:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No problem, that's what I thought, maybe a footnote about the conflict between authors would be useful to readers. Anyway, good luck with your planned GA nom. Cheers,  Baffle☿gab  18:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Criticism section in Michelle Salzman
Why did you revert my edit of adding a 'Criticism' section? I feel that it should be separate so that people can distinguish and read it easily. Currently, it's embedded in other sections. Gsgdd (talk) 09:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:CRITS, which I think explains it better than I could. Curbon7 (talk) 09:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

= December 2023 =

The Signpost: 4 December 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A. J. Rosier
The article A. J. Rosier you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A. J. Rosier for comments about the article, and Talk:A. J. Rosier/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Muttnick -- Muttnick (talk) 15:01, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

First Edit Day
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, Ezra Cricket (talk) 03:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments you left on an article
Hallo. thank you for the review you made on the draft: Draft:Isaac Christopher Lubogo I have edited again. Kindly let me know of any other comments. Thanks Jonan terry (talk) 19:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi. I did not review your draft, that would be . Cheers, Curbon7 (talk) 20:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!


– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message. – robertsky (talk) 06:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Legislative Assembly of Zabaykalsky Krai
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Legislative Assembly of Zabaykalsky Krai, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Curbon7&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1192757638 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Legislative_Assembly_of_Zabaykalsky_Krai&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1192757638%7CLegislative%20Assembly%20of%20Zabaykalsky%20Krai%5D%5D Ask for help])

= January 2024 =

List of Alpha Phi Omega members
Just a note, I'm probably responsible for about 95% of the entries on the page (over the last decade or so), and I do have a COI (I'm an Alpha Phi Omega brother), though I tend to work across the articles on Fraternities and Sororities as well. I've tended to work under the idea that University Presidents should be on the list regardless of whether they have an article given that they have equal level of notability regardless of whether they have an article. The issues of the Torch and Trefoil are available online if that helps, I just haven't gone through the slog of linking them since that doesn't matter to notability. Looking forward to your work.Naraht (talk) 14:00, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The H symbol was an effort a *long* time ago to change some of the text to a graphic to make it shorter. If that is what makes sense to more closely align it with List of Alpha Phi Alpha brothers, so be it. Note, APO USA and APO Philippines *both* start with Alpha and go to Omega, then Alpha Alpha and so on. Alpha for the USA is Lafayette College, Alpha for the Philippines is Far Eastern University and so on, so *something* needing to distinguish the Philippine chapters from the US chapters is needed. Also there are some brothers from the Philippines which are Honorary brothers of APO-USA (like Carlos Romulo). Given that the change has started, I'm willing to help if you are comfortable that it isn't an edit that COI would cause an issue with. And I am an Alpha Phi Omega brother, *but* the concensus on WP:FRAT has generally been that edits to chapter listing and member listings aren't particularly ones that COI influences, your call.Naraht (talk) 00:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * , thank you, and good work keeping that list very well-sourced over the years. My knowledge of fraternities is minimal and surface-level (I was once offered a bid for my university's chapter of Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia, but did not take it due to in-fighting in the chapter). I think any COI you have is minimal here, as this is just a list of notables, so go for it. Curbon7 (talk) 00:31, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * While I may not theoretically have COI, it *is* an article that I do take a *great* deal of personal pride in. Over the last decade the Alpha Phi Omega national office has started checking its list of Notable members against this article. :) Then you make a wonderful NPOV person on the article. Now what I really should do is take all of the references that are to the Torch and Trefoil (our national magazine) and turn them into cite web and link them appropriate to http://www.apoarchive.org/ .Naraht (talk) 01:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Philippines
The change you've made simply won't work. With the way that you have it, you haven't added *anything* visible to differentiate between someone who is a member of Alpha chapter of APO-USA and Alpha chapter of APO-Phil. *something* needs to be on each line indicating if the membership is in APO-Phil or APO-USA.Naraht (talk) 01:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Is (Philippines) next to the chapter name not enough? I'm not sure the ante version is compliant with MOS:FLAG. Curbon7 (talk) 01:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Ah. Missed that you added (Philippines) in a previous edit. Sorry. Also, if you get the chance, I did add two COI edit templates to the talk page for one row addition and one reference for an unreferenced entry. Also, a request, if you start removing entries, could you that separately so that I can get a clean diff showing which ones are removed for lack of reference?Naraht (talk) 01:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Lieutenant Governors & Generals.
Looking through the listings, I'm surprised that you consider the Lieutenant Governors of Philippine provinces to be non-notable. I believe that Lieutenant Governors of US States would be considered so, so I think that fits the same rule. Also, I know that WP:NSOLDIER doesn't apply any more, but the question is whether Generals should be in a list like this, I believe that they should. Let me know when you get to the end of the trimming and I'll go through the list of the deleted specifically..Naraht (talk) 14:05, 9 January 2024 (UTC)


 * As the Philippines is a unitary country, provincial officials do not meet WP:NPOL. My understanding of MOS:LIST is that dynamic lists such as this should only include notable examples (which means (a) currently existing articles, or (b) definitively notable redlinks, such as those who pass NPOL or who blatantly meet WP:GNG). Curbon7 (talk) 20:52, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry, didn't see your response. Hmm. Will have to go through TP:GNG more clearly for those. Have you completed the trimming?Naraht (talk) 19:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Aimeliik State Legislature
Hello, Curbon7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aimeliik State Legislature, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Beatrice Green
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beatrice Green you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JimKillock -- JimKillock (talk) 08:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I've done my initial review, and thank you for putting your article forward. Great to read about Beatrice. Jim Killock (talk) 10:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mary Woffington
The article Mary Woffington you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mary Woffington for comments about the article, and Talk:Mary Woffington/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GnocchiFan -- GnocchiFan (talk) 20:04, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Curbon7, for creating this article and bringing it up to GA status. Keep up the good work.--Ipigott (talk) 09:23, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2024
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Fidel Antonio Novoa Fuentes
All citations from FamilySearch have been eliminated per directive. Please advise next steps. Fjnovoa (talk) 20:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2024
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

= February 2024 =

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 February 2024
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Beatrice Green
The article Beatrice Green you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Beatrice Green for comments about the article, and Talk:Beatrice Green/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JimKillock -- JimKillock (talk) 23:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry for the long delay, I have been seriously unwell over the past several months and haven't been able to edit very much. I'm trying to get a normal editing pace again and I'll continue working on this article. Curbon7 (talk) 05:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to hear that! I hope you are better now. What is there is advice and suggestions, your article on Beatrice is very well written and a credit to Wikipedia's coverage, both of female politicians and Welsh Labour history, and I was glad to have the opportunity to learn about her. Jim Killock (talk) 10:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Samuel Miele (Resubmit Draft)
Added much more information about subject background and believe it warrants his own page. He has a political career and also becoming a central part of the Santos scandal. Please resubmit. SaltyLamb (talk) 04:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

= March 2024 =

The Signpost: 2 March 2024
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Roy Earl Parrish
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Roy Earl Parrish you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 22:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello! There are a few minor issues to be fixed. Please have a look at the review page and address them as soon as you have availability. Thankss! —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello, apologies for the delay, I have been seriously unwell over the past few months. I will look into completing this GA today. Thanks. Curbon7 (talk) 05:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Roy Earl Parrish
The article Roy Earl Parrish you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Roy Earl Parrish for comments about the article, and Talk:Roy Earl Parrish/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 19:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

DRV close
Hi, I understand that you undid the close, but I actually did not miss any of the facts, and closed the way I did for a reason. I do not consider that nomination to be a request to review of the linked AfD, I don't think that that AfDs close was truly challenged, and I consider that a page reinstatement request for the BJP Annamalai over the existing one. It's a "clear the name to free it up for the other politician" request, and the putative challenge of the AfD close is obviously perfunctory and frankly offensive, I don't take it in good faith, and that AfD was disruptive in and of itself. —Alalch E. 23:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Considering this, that AfD does not need to be endorsed to stand. —Alalch E. 23:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I would note however that the filer included the phrase several times (though in fairness it seems to quite matter to them), and their original rationale focused primarily on AIADMK Annamalai with little paid to BJP Annamalai until after I WP:HEYed the article. Curbon7 (talk) 23:14, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Please, consider everything that the nominator wrote as a whole and understand the intent. It is very clearly a tendentious and abuse-of-process request intended to enable the creation of the article about the BJP Annamalai that masquerades as a challenge of the other Annamalai's keep AfD, and it was started during an existing DRV about the BJP Annamalai that was not going well. See how participants suggested literally banning the nominator, adding the page to DEEPER etc. This is not my original reasoning. —Alalch E. 23:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * All in all, you undid my close based on your belief that I didn't have the right facts, and that I misidentified the AfD, but I did actually have the right facts, and I have my reasoning that could be somewhat different than yours, and I stand by my close as a proper and needed close. A moderate difference in opinion should not be a reason for you to undo my close. You should still see my close at least as reasonable. I actually think it's excelletn. I propose that you undo the reversal of the close, because it is not an "improper close" as you wrote.—Alalch E. 23:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * On re-reading the filer also state, so it's clear what their ultimate intent is, but I would still argue that the topics here are distanced. Regardless, the DRV has been re-closed as endorsed by . Curbon7 (talk) 23:49, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2024
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

= April 2024 =

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello ,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Käte Selbmann


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Käte Selbmann, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rusty4321 talk contribs 15:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)


 * , Please take more due diligence before CSD tagging. It takes two seconds to check my other articles to know that this is how I start drafts. I do this as a courtesy to other editors while I am still in the research phase. Curbon7 (talk) 18:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for telling me. I do check on some but not all drafts’ page histories. I plan to do this more often now that you have brought it to my attention. Rusty4321  talk contribs 18:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Blank draft pages
Hello, Curbon7,

I was looking at our CSD G13 list for April 20, 2024 and saw all of these blank drafts on State legislatures coming due at the 22:32 UTC hour (you can sort the list by time). There is practically no content so I was going to delete them as test edits and then I saw that you were the page creator. So, do you think you are going to create content on them over the next day? If you want to keep blank pages, it's better to keep them in your User space so you don't have to worry about G13 (as long as you don't have an AFC template on the page). Even if you make a minor edit to try to delay deletion, they really should be deleted as test pages as they are simply empty pages with no information. So, assuming that no one else comes across them before you come back to Wikipedia, what do you intend to do with them? At this point, they have existed as blank pages since May 2023. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 05:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks . This was a project I never got around to completing and likely will not; I've lost the main source I was using and have been unable to find it again (I think it got removed off of JSTOR). It seems I had forgotten to G7 these. Thanks for reaching out. Curbon7 (talk) 05:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I wasn't expecting you to tag them CSD G7 but I guess it was one way to resolve the issue and I didn't end up filling up your User talk page with CSD G13 notices! Those draft pages are always there if you want to get the project started up again! Liz Read! Talk! 21:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Accepting draft
Hi @Curbon7, I saw you accepted the draft I declined earlier. You really really did well. All I wanna say is thanks. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 06:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2024
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

= May 2024 =

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
<section begin="announcement-content" />
 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" />

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

AFD
Please read wp:Afd which stipulates discussions must be open for at least 7 days. Thank you for understanding. Railrider12 (talk)
 * , They are typically open for seven days, but can be closed sooner if it meets the Snowball clause, that being . This is a completely nonsensical nomination and is frankly a waste of time. Wikipedia is not a public polling venue. Curbon7 (talk) 01:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * If that’s true Then what is the point of all those AFd pages? Railrider12 (talk) 03:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Re-read my reply more carefully. Curbon7 (talk) 03:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2024
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A complete nonsequitur
"The only thing I care about here is that the articles I create are sufficiently linked. If there is an applicable country subarticle (1975 in Austria does not currently exist) I always add new creations there, if there is not then I must add to the main year article until such a page is created."
 * No, you mustn't add to the main year article. The most appropriate course of action is to create the sub-article. If you can't manage that, it must be because nothing of note happened in that year in Austria. Deb (talk) 18:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I've already created 1975 in Austria myself. includes plenty of events and such, and it was also the year of the OPEC siege. Curbon7 (talk) 18:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That was the right thing to do. Deb (talk) 19:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Annemarie Kletzl
Hello, Curbon7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Annemarie Kletzl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

= June 2024 =

RfA
Hey! Are you interested in running for RfA? Your ORCP a while back got very positive responses, so I think you'd have an easy time. I'd be happy to nominate you, and I'm sure a lot of others would as well :) —Ingenuity (t • c) 00:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hear, hear.  Schwede 66  02:12, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * , thank you for your support my friends! I recently completed my graduate school applications, which was the last things keeping me busy, so you'll be hearing more from me soon. Curbon7 (talk) 22:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * First things first. BusterD (talk) 18:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 June 2024
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

My edit to Miami-Dade County
Can you like not revert my edits with no probable cause as to you reverting them. I assumed the reason you reverted my edit on the page for Miami-Dade County because of the edit summary and the fact that I forgot to add a source but I didnt think I needed to source it because as you can tell from the map in the infobox it's obvious that it's in the southern half of Florida, but I added it anyway so that you dont revert it back. The info was already there. The source doesnt need to be on the page itself. MidAtlanticBaby (talk) 09:28, 18 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Your bizarre edit summary is indeed what drew my attention. Such humor tends to not translate well over screen. Curbon7 (talk) 09:34, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

K. Annamalai (1984)
please move Draft:K. Annamalai to K. Annamalai by --Sunuraju (talk) 09:09, 20 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, the path to recreation is listed at Draft:K. Annamalai, namely requiring the original AfD be overturned through WP:DRV. Curbon7 (talk) 17:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Joseph Branch
Noted here though unclear which one. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Also noted on three pages here. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red July 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

= July 2024 =

The Signpost: 4 July 2024
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Aimeliik State Legislature
Hello, Curbon7,

I just noticed that this draft is due to be deleted as a stale draft and you are unlikely to receive a notification so here is one. Thanks. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 02:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the notification. This project was initially put on the backburner as the main source had been removed from JSTOR, but it seems to be back so I'll move these to the front of my queue. Curbon7 (talk) 03:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

strikethrough
Just FYI, the valid code for that is &lt;s&gt;...&lt;/s&gt;. The &lt;strike&gt;...&lt;/strike&gt; version hasn't been valid HTML since the 1990s. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  02:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

AFCH
Hello, can you submit a draft then reviewing it yourself? That's a little bit strange. -Lemonaka 03:38, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm discussing Jacob A. Eaton -Lemonaka  03:39, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes this is allowed; the AFC process is an entirely optional one. Curbon7 (talk) 05:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I knew AFC process is an entirely optional one, what about directly move it to (main) namespace? Anyway, it's a bit of against common sense that you can reviewed a draft submitted by yourself. -Lemonaka  06:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I was going to move it to mainspace anyways, as it is a notable and sufficient draft. It is more convenient to move an AFC draft using AFCH, as this automatically cleans up the draft and notifies the creator. This saves at least a few minutes from using the normal page move tool. If you disagree, you are welcome to discuss at WT:AFC or other processes; I always welcome review. Curbon7 (talk) 20:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC)