Talk:Athletic Model Guild

Untitled
As the creator of this page, I myself understand if the information may not be deemed, per se', currently "as relevant" as other things. It's curious that Wikipedia's servers can afford such minutiae as pages for individual users, yet at the same time actively pursue removal of entries no longer "en vogue", as it were, however I digress, heh. A mention of the work of the company, as part of a greater collective of gay history, would be deemed sufficient to me, provided a brief link to AMG's web pages on their own history, which is here : http://www.athleticmodelguild.com - be provided. First-hand accounts from the company, generally speaking, can be much more detailed than our comparatively short summaries. The work many users have put into these pages is appreciated, and while the two may be unrelated, AMG itself is actually back as a company, so in a sense it is "actively preserving itself", if we will. Thank you! Geoff43230 (talk) 02:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)geoff43230