Talk:Australian Technology Network

Should this page really have the paragraphs about "look how cool we are"? I've snipped the worst of it, (Curtin, for instance is less world-class than many other unis according to international perception rankings); but surely either the links to the uni pages are sufficient or paragraphs that say something more substancial should be written. matturn 09:21, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

This article looks like it could have been ripped from an ATN promotional brochure... except worse.

At the moment this page is an insult to reputation of its member universities. Mentioning "vibrant", "dynamic", "innovative", "exciting", "energetic", etc... too many times has the opposite effect to that desired.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Australian Technology Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081014063757/http://www.atn.edu.au/about/overview.htm to http://www.atn.edu.au/about/overview.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070606213317/http://www.griffith.edu.au:80/vc/ate/content_inst_atn_au.html to http://www.griffith.edu.au/vc/ate/content_inst_atn_au.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)