Talk:Babylon 5: The Legend of the Rangers

This movie is tough to call a Babylon 5 sequel
I say that as no ship classes or tecnology was borrowed from previous series or movies. Furthermore, of previously known characters, only G'Kar makes an appearance with John Sheridan mentioned.

I also thought that when Martell's career was threatened, the Grey Council would have no authority. The Rangers were transferred the Interstellar Alliance's jurisdiction when the ISA was created.Will 08:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Uh, the fact that Babylon 5 itself appears at the end of the movie (which is where the Rangers take G'Kar at the end of their mission) kind of puts it in the Babylon 5 universe, and positions it as a sequel. Just because B5 itself isn't central, and we see new/different technology & characters, doesn't make this any less of a sequel. Kevyn 02:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a spin-off, not a sequel. Ausir 14:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

In these terms spin-off and sequel are one and the same.

I totally agree i was really disapointed! I liked all the movies apart from this one the could have had president john sheridan or deleen! And minbar looked stupid the grey council room place lol looked stupid the jump gates looked better but i didnt like them. They totally should of took of from a movie and worked with all the previous babylon 5. And involved ivoniva somehow in her ship. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathewd (talk • contribs) 07:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

2265
Is there any reliable source confirming that the film’s story is set in 2265? —  NickTheRed37 (0x54 · 0x43) 12:36, 13 June 2017 (UTC)