Talk:Bardahl

POV?
The majority of this article (from "Background" onwards, added in the past few days by IP editors) seems rather POV. DH85868993 14:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Seems? It reads like an ad copy, slightly modified for Wikipedia. The whole article should probably be deleted.Unright (talk) 21:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I disagree. The brand and its history are important; the massive listing of every single product is probably not (I suspect it was copied and pasted from the corporate website). Remove the "catalog" at the end of the article, along with some of the more promotional language, and it's fine. Duncan1800 (talk) 06:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Who has the authority to definitely modify this article? I agree with Duncan. Keep the article up the the extensive product listing. 15:04, 3 march 2009 (EST)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.83.103.33 (talk)
 * There is no authority. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. But most volunteer editors agree that articles that look like press releases should be rewritten. Also, see conflict of interest, since this was very likely written by Bardahl employees. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)