Talk:Bert Cochran

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biased[edit]

It seems that this article may be overly charitable to Cochran to the extent that implies his differences with the SWP emanated from opposition to sectarian abstentionism of the leadership line. While Cochran may have indeed criticized dogmatism and sectarianism, evidence suggests that he and his group were in fact in essence themselves abstentionists retreating from political struggle and organized activism in the wake of the repression of the McCarthy period. At least this is what this writer was told in 1976 by Vincent Copeland, a member of the SWP at the time as part of the tendency led by him and Sam Marcy that later formed Workers World Party: that while they found little to disagree with politically with Pablo and his European cothinkers, they found the Cochran group's retreat from political struggle discouraging and did not agree with it, considering that their linking with Pablo was a convenient pretext for them to escape from what they considered a difficult situation.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bert Cochran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]