Talk:bet365 Stadium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

'Citation needed' tags[edit]

In my opinion, it verges on the vandalistic to add so many 'citation needed' tags unless there is doubt about the veracity of the statements. Why go around doing things like this? Of course it's preferable to have citations, but at least some contributors have had a try at writing some useful content – there would be precious little on the page without their uncited material – and their work shouldn't be adulterated in this unhelpful way, which only serves to make the article into an unpleasant read. Russ London (talk) 09:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Segregation?[edit]

Mention is given to a reduction of capacity due to segregation. This must have a different meaning in the UK than here in the US. Perhaps someone could explain, since I doubt this refers to separating different races.Wschart (talk) 00:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It means separating home and away fans! The word segregation doesn't have the same resonance in the UK because we never had big racial issues. —Half Price 20:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so how does that effect seating capacity? We do the same thing over here in some cases (particularly in high school sports where travel distances are typically small), and there's no effect on capacity. Do they leave a buffer zone of un-occupied seats between the fans in one stand?Wschart (talk) 13:57, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's exactly that. The organisers will sometimes leave a strip of about 10 to 15 seats empty, with security people situated between the two groups. How many seats are left empty depends on the risk assessment of the match concerned and the stadium design. There is a picture on the Old Firm article showing Rangers and Celtic fans being "segregated' during a game at Celtic Park. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 12:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 June 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 07:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Britannia Stadium → Bet365 Stadium – The club has changed the sponsorship of the stadium from the Britannia Building Society to Bet365. Officially took effect on 1 June 2016. Add92 (talk) 14:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The commonname is still Britannia Stadium which is the original name for the stadium. Qed237 (talk) 15:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Qed237 (talk) 15:27, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, as it's just one sponsor replacing another. There isn't a common unsponsored name (as with COMS or Dean Court) that I am aware of. The most relevant example of this is Bolton, which is quite similar to Stoke in terms of the dates used for each sponsor name. It had been known as the Reebok Stadium from opening in 1997 until 2014, when it was renamed (and is now titled here) as the Macron Stadium. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Please note Talk:City of Manchester Stadium#Requested move 18 February 2015 which was not moved and we should be consistent. Qed237 (talk) 19:36, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support @Qed237: Britannia Stadium is also a sponsored name (paid for by Britannia), so there is no problem in moving this to another sponsored name (see the Bolton example above). As far as I am aware, there is no commonly known unsponsored name for this ground. Number 57 20:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Britannia Stadium was a sponsored name, Bet365 Stadium is also a sponsored name. The stadium has never had a non-sponsored name. It would be unreasonable for the article to remain named after a previous sponsor. TheBigJagielka (talk) 21:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support In the absence of a non-sponsored common name, I don't see what else we should call it. --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 21:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Hate the proposed name however if the previous was a sponsored name then I don't really have a leg to stand on .... It's stupid ... I dislike it ... but I'm supporting anyway , –Davey2010Talk 03:01, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Both Britannia and Bet365 are sponsor names, so I'd prefer neither used. However, this Stadium doesn't have a non-sponsor name, therefore makes sense to move it, per King Power Stadium. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - As above, since this stadium has never had an unsponsored name, we should definitely update the article title with the name of the new sponsor. – PeeJay 09:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support no-brainer really. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The previous common name is also a sponsor name, so it seems doubtful that it will be called the Britannia in common parlance in the future.--EchetusXe 16:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, as said, I dislike sponsor names aswell but Britannia is one also and I wouldn't see why that name is better than the current sponsor name. // Psemmler (talk) 21:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, sponsor names go in the titles of stadiums which never had another name, like the Reebok/Macron. This doesn't include grounds like the City of Manchester Stadium which have a base name for when sponsorship ends. '''tAD''' (talk) 20:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - while we do not usually use sponsored names for football clubs/stadiums/competitions, as N57 points out there is no unsponsored name, so we'll have to move it to this. AMF. GiantSnowman 14:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bet365 Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bet365 Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name capitalisation[edit]

The name of this article should not, per Wikipedia policy (MOS:TMRULES, be written in all lowercase. The policy has been repeatedly cited by several editors in correcting this, but this is being reverted without discussion. Mauls (talk) 20:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bet365_Stadium&oldid=1199924302"