Talk:Bharat Sevashram Sangha

Re-creation
I had to recreate this page after an "idiot", who claims to be an administrator had put a spam by calling it a Boddhist organization and he did not mind in putting cut & pastet texts from some wired news pages... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.2.7  (talk • contribs) 13:24, November 18, 2008


 * That is because the text you put in is blatant promotion of the organisation. Please observe WP:NPOV when writing on Wikipedia. The previous article is definitely not neutral and was deleted for that reason. Thank you. Pegasus &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 16:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Then what would you call this for Jesus - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus ???... Mohammad - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamad?
 * and above all Pope?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope Shall I keep going???
 * according to your logic all these should be deleted.
 * The Jesus article is described as "Jesus has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria." I agree w/ this comment. On the same ground my article is equally good Philosophy and religion article. If you deny, then you have to undo what you said about the "Jesus" article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cppcat (talk • contribs) 01:54, November 23, 2008


 * There are many reasons why I called you an "idiot!" One is for making cut & paste texts from a wired news paper (Telegraph) and secondly calling it a Buddhist organization... you are putting nothing other than a spam....
 * I studied the NPOV, and I found nothing conflicting against what I'm doing here. I'm putting an authentic historic article about an organization which I know well, and which many others are interested in knowing well... I happily let others (of course not people like you who would google to find texts to frame comments) change!
 * Thank you for your comments... hope now these guys will stop their religious biasness and I'll be able to complete the project. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cppcat (talk • contribs) 02:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Do not make personal attacks against other editors. Calling someone "idiot" is a personal attack.
 * How good an article is depends on how much sourced and verifiable info it has. If there is lots of info but no sources then it is a terrible article. I have just labelled all the info that will need to be sourced. If there are no sources it will have to be removed. Kimchi.sg &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 23:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I would suggest do little reading before you pass a remark like "blatant promotion of the organisation". Only a dumb person would talk on a subject about which he/she has no clue and make a complete fool about him/herself. Going forward, do not delete the pages which someone is tryin' to put in place.... leave the decision to the readers, if they feel it is "blatant promotion..." or not. Why do you want to decide for them?


 * I had read the article and it was very neat and it never bragged about the organisation. Park your judgement and remarks as it is biased.


 * —Preceding unsigned comment added by Koushik Roy (talk • contribs) 02:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

I apologize for the personal attack even though the editor behaves rudely by simply deleting the content and adding junk data (viz. it is not a Buddist Organization - it is a Hindu organization). Today I added several supporting references 93rd party) to earn your confidence. Hope we can work together. UNFORTUNATELY we worked simultanously and I'd overridden your changes and I could not revert back (using the version control). PL add your comments so that we can work together to get this project going adhering to wiki policies. Cppcat (talk) 23:38, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

PL NOTE: I'm not done w/ adding supporting contents (for some there will be no supporting content - viz his childhood etc as references to those are limited and available as part of non-electronic books. Cppcat (talk) 23:41, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Further pruning
I've removed most of the promotional speech from the article. As it stands, everything left in it should either be properly cited to independent reliable sources, or removed. I'll see what I can find later this week, but this is the base to start from. &mdash;  The Hand That Feeds You :Bite 23:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Updated External links
Kimchi.sg: I've updated all possible references (external links) to support "citations". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cppcat (talk • contribs) 05:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Kimchi.sg: WHAT IS HAPPENING ? WHY ANOTHER ADMIN CAME AND DELETED THE IMAGE??? LOOK HOW POORLY YOU (WIKI) ARE MANAGED... I'M QUITTING... IT IS A COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cppcat (talk • contribs) 13:35, November 25, 2008

help for the controversy
can ny 1 provide me information as what was the controversy against with the pond with bharat sevashram sangha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdcb4u (talk • contribs) 12:47, 2 October 2012 (UTC)