Talk:Bianca Jackson

Name
Was thinking, did Bianca definitely change her name after divorcing Ricky? Liam is called Butcher so i thought she may have kept the name. But i can't remember myself, too young too remember really. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparhelda (talk • contribs)


 * When she was seen in 2002, after divorcing Ricky, she enrolled at college under the name of Jackson. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 20:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * K. Never saw the spin-off myself.  They have her listed as 'Bianca Butcher' on the BBC eastenders website for some reason -Sparhelda


 * That's probably because she was Butcher when she left the main serial. Also, they're not that good, the Wikipedia articles on EastEnders provide a much better source of information than the official site! -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 18:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Yep, have to agree there. We're the best! -Sparhelda


 * In the light of her recent marriage I'm bringing this up again - Shouldn't the name be reverted back to Butcher? She was known as Butcher for over 10 years until her return, she's already widely recognised under that name and will be using it for the forseeable future too. Ooh, Fruity (talk) 23:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Considering she's only just married I'd keep it as Jackson for now, I certainly think of her as Bianca Jackson still. I Googled both names and "Bianca Jackson" far outnumbers "Bianca Butcher" by about 24:1. anemoneprojectors   talk  23:42, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Just wondering if it's time to bring up again that maybe Bianca should have her page move from Jackson to Butcher? I think she is more commonly known as Butcher these days, rather than Jackson. 81.20.179.232 (talk) 18:09, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No, she should not. – Anemone Projectors – 10:20, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No need to be obtuse and rude AP, how about explaining your opinions? No, I don't think Bianca should be changed to Butcher yet, although it's probably more even now than before, she is still known slightly more as a Jackson in my opinion, so should stay with that name. Bleaney (talk) 17:52, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:NAT B2.jpg
Image:NAT B2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ricky Bianca 2002.jpg
Image:Ricky Bianca 2002.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Nat andB.jpg
Image:Nat andB.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

How many 'a's in 'Rickaaaaaay!'?
Can we verify it's spelt with six 'a's? :P -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 17:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm hoping this is a joke, but according to this BBC source, it's 7 'a's check the caption under the wdding pic.  Gung  adin  17:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * It was a joke, but maybe we should change it to seven, so we can back up the spelling with a source! -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 18:03, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * BBC News is actually a very reliable source, so I think it's safe to go with 7. But you MUST cite the source!!! That's very VERY VERY important!!!!!!!! ;) anemone  │  projectors  22:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Looks like someone's had too much fizzy pop... -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 17:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Max Branning spiked my drink. anemone  │  projectors  20:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

New image
Yoo hoo! Trampikey are u around?? I just took a cap of B from the new advert for her return. Shall I put it on, even tho she's not back looking like that on-screen yet?

Oh, I will, but we can always revert if you think we should. Gung adin  19:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I like it, but I think we should include the previous image somewhere as well as it illustrates B in the 90s. Did you get a cap of Rickaaaaaaay too? -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 22:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * And it should be replaced with a picture from the actual serial as soon as it can be :) (The trailer is brilliant!) -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 22:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeh, shame we have to replace it, cos for some reason that image is better quality than they shoot regular episodes of EE in. Must be filmed in a different way. I have a screenie of B from Jan 1994 we could use for the early shot. once I flesh out the OOU, i'll uplaod. or this one is from late 1994, or early 1995, i think. It was around the time when Bianca was conning David and her mum to pay the rent for her new flat, and she was pocketing all the money :)  Gung  adin  00:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * That one is 2002  Gung  adin  00:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I think the adverts are filmed with different film or something... -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 00:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh forgot to say, I did get a cap of Ricky, but it's not so good. his face is all darkened, but they lit Bianca's up.Or maybe it's just her pale skin :) Gung  adin  01:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

GA
If we source the plot, do you think we could get GA with this one? Gung adin  00:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok I sourced the plot. It's quite small compared to the OOU stuff. Do you think we should nominate it ? Gung  adin  18:30, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


 * If you want, but I don't want to have to drastically change it like we had to do with Pauline. I can't be arsed with all that stress again... -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 18:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Me either, but it's not FA, so it wont be nearly as bad as Pauline. It's just one reviewer on GA. Gung adin  18:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


 * That's alright then! :) -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 18:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Since when?
Did Bianca return to the square between the spin off and now I noted it mentioned on the Liam article? 172.142.103.236 (talk) 23:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * She didn't. She was last seen in Walford in 1999. Gung adin  23:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

3 month pregnancy?
This can't be right... "in September 1998 Bianca fell pregnant for a second time. She gave birth to baby Liam on Christmas Day in The Queen Vic". -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 14:39, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha well spotted. I removed "September". AnemoneProjectors (talk) 15:43, 12 January 2010 (UTC)


 * If I remember correctly, Liam was premature, around seven months I think, so she would have gotten pregnant about May, but I don't think there is a source anywhere so maybe just put early 1998? Alex250P (talk) 23:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't say when she fell pregnant, though maybe if Liam was premature then she didn't know she was pregnant until September. Just a guess. Just say that Liam was born at Christmas, and if he was premature, then say that. Liam's page says he was premature. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:40, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

ok then.--Woodhouse2000 (talk) 16:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


 * huh? Anemone  Projectors  16:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Departure
Just wanted to mention that Palmer is still being credited on 31 December 2010 and there's been no indication that that's the day she leaves. But we have been told it's over the Christmas period though but that could mean New Year's Day. Chances are she'd still appear after what happens happens... Anemone Projectors  17:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Natasha
I'm confused. Was Natasha born or aborted? It said in one bit that 'Ricky and Bianca got the chance to hold their dead daughter'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boushenheiser (talk • contribs) 10:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

She was aborted, but late into the pregnancy - meaning Bianca had to give birth to Natasha even though she was dead, but due to her being a late gestation, they had to file a birth and death certificate, as if she had been stillborn. Alex250P (talk) 17:32, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for clearing that up. Boushenheiser (talk) 21:55, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Cousins
Derek Brannings two kids Joey and I forget the girls name

Stephen Beale (through Simon Wicks) Lucy Beale and Peter Beale (Through Ian) seems only Max's Kids have been added QueenAlexandria UTC 17/08/12 21:42 —Preceding undated comment added 20:42, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Bianca is related to a hell of a lot of people currently in on the Square, and I think listing all of them would be rediculous... Also, we tend to only list characters as relatives if they have actually shared a scene together, and Bianca has not met Joey or Alice yet. Bleaney (talk) 01:46, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Not just shared a scene but if they are important to the other person's storylines. – Anemone Projectors – 12:13, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

That's a pretty stupid 'logic' to go by. Just because a character didn't interact with past familial relatives does not mean they shouldn't be mentioned. Keeping her uncle and grandfather added would fill more gaps for viewers of Eastenders. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.125.163 (talk) 00:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Bianca said that Ricky was her ex-husband
She did, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're divorced. However, it's the best thing we have, and is probably correct. However, Ricky left in 2012 so we don't know if said divorce would have taken place in 2012 or 2013. – Anemone Projectors – 10:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Family
Uh, David Wicks is her father then that means Simon Wicks is her uncle. It doesn't need to be removed and it is sourced. Her grandfather is Pete Beale. A character's family isn't ignored just because the current character never interacted with other characters. She never interacted with her niece Rebecca. Stephbenb: your logic is flawed. I never one of my grandfathers, so does that mean then there needs to be no mention of him on my family chart? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.125.163 (talk) 00:51, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Related to Ian?
How exactly is Ian Bianca's uncle? I'm just kinda curious :/ 151.224.135.50 (talk) 22:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Her father, David, shares the same father with Ian, which makes them half-brothers. So Ian is Bianca's half-uncle. He is also a half-great uncle to Bianca's children, and David is a half-uncle to the Beale twins and Bobby, who are Bianca's half-cousins. Hope this helped ;) SamLaws81101 (talk) 22:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)