Talk:Bibeltemplet

POV
He was not convicted to prison for the guest's statements. I believe this is an attempt to promote the Bibeltemplet website. This was barely news in Sweden.--Ezeu 01:19, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

You must be misinformed, Ezeu. This is what Göteborgs-Posten wrote:

"Vidare fällde tingsrätten Liljeström för brott mot lagen om elektroniska anslagstavlor för att ha gett utrymme åt andra att sprida åsikter som uttrycker missaktning..."

You are also wrong in that it was "barely news in Sweden". The case was followed and reported by Swedish state TV, Radio, and by all the news papers.

Furthermore, there is no promotion here, only a fair presentation of facts, just as they are, as everyone who knows Swedish can check through the search links provided.
 * Fair enough. I made some edits and removed the tags.--Ezeu 02:37, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Jailed for 'Holding' a view?
It says that the guy was sentenced for holding and expressing an opinion. Is it accurate to say he was sentenced for *holding* an opinion that surely would have been internal to his own mind.

Iæfai (talk) 18:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bibeltemplet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050905085510/http://www.bibeltemplet.se/ to http://bibeltemplet.se/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080115223140/http://timescolumns.typepad.com/gledhill/2007/11/nglar-i-sodom.html to http://timescolumns.typepad.com/gledhill/2007/11/nglar-i-sodom.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:15, 17 September 2017 (UTC)