Talk:Black coral

Cultural use
Does anyone have any information on the cultural/historical uses of black coral? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.36.132.191 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

Largest forest found in Calabria
http://www.ansa.it/site/notizie/awnplus/english/news/2009-03-19_119350685.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.25.193.213 (talk) 10:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Reference 3
Reference 3 no longer exists and should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darktangent (talk • contribs) 14:58, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Alternate (to the Graczyk AP news-article) Cesiumfrog (talk) 23:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Modification in Section Family
In the Family section, the genus Aphanipathes should be classified in the section Family Aphanipathidae and not in the section Family Antipathidae. This can be confirm from information obtained from these two websites:

The Global Biodiversity Information Facility: GBIF Backbone Taxonomy, 2013-07-01. Accessed via http://www.gbif.org/species/2258118 on 2015-03-27

I recommend making this change and I will make the change unless someone objects. MauriGirl14 (talk) 22:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I have moved the genus Aphanipathes to the section Family Aphanipathidae. However, I have noticed that there are some disagreement in the correct taxonomic classification of this genus. I will leave the genus Aphanipathes in the section Family Aphanipathidae though because the taxonomic information available at the two websites that I provided in my previous comment above are the most recently updated information that I was able to find. MauriGirl14 (talk) 22:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

How do I get this re-reviewed for status?
I think that this article has gone past start-class. Hopefully, if it gets re-reviewed, it can go up to c-class. How do I nominate it to be re-reviewed?

Thanks! Aven Az13 (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Aven Az13, anyone (including you) can reassess the article by rating it compared to the criteria listed at WP:ASSESS. Additionally, some individual projects may have further requirements (eg. an image or infobox) at certain levels. I do agree with you that the article is certainly above a "start" level, perhaps even a B. 'Cheers, Loopy30 (talk) 21:05, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Reassessment of the article
I have rated the article as being C-class on all wikiprojects. Though it may be comprehensive enough and well-enough witten to warrant it being a B-class, I'm going to wait until we have more sources that are more reliable. Thanks, Loopy30. Aven 00:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)