Talk:Burnopfield

NO to merger

 * No to Merger. this merger is a poor idea. it proposes to merge two very distinct subjects. Ouedbirdwatcher (talk) 15:18, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

MERGE
Having lived in the village for a long time this must be merged. There is no distinct village of Sheephill. There were in the past a number of villages i.e. Lintz, Leazes, Burnopfield and to a lesser extent even Crookgate that have become known as Burnopfield. Try to find the village of Sheephill on a map. All you will find is a street at the East of Burnopfield called Sheephill. Markthompson77 (talk) 11:54, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

More Reasons to Merge
Sheephill is a street within Burnopfield and definitely does not carry the village status. The Sheephill article does not however, suggest that Sheephill is a village in its own right. User —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.15.27.103 (talk) 16:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Burnopfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041118190844/http://www.keystothepast.info:80/durhamcc/K2P.nsf/K2PDetail?readform&PRN=D6754 to http://www.keystothepast.info/durhamcc/K2P.nsf/K2PDetail?readform&PRN=D6754

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:26, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Merger proposal
I propose that Lintz be merged into Burnopfield. The former is an extremely short stub about an adjacent hamlet, with a map reference being the only source provided. It can be easily described in the article on its larger neighbour. Jellyman (talk) 09:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC) Agree. Tacyarg (talk) 17:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)