Talk:C++11

Incorrect example for regular expression.
It seems to be incorrect.

Fixed. 2022 Dec 9 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basilmozzarella (talk • contribs) 01:07, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

References to C++03 language
I disagree with the comparisons to a "C++03" language in the article. AFAIK there has never been such a thing, and no compiler have ever supported a C++03 version of C++. They have supported C++98 until the switched to the next version of the core language C++11. There was no changes to the language itself in between, only errata to the C++98 standard.Carewolf (talk) 13:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Then what is this: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=38110 which is titled ISO/IEC 14882:2003 Programming languages -- C++? Do they publish an entirely new standards document just to handle errata? &mdash; franl &#124; talk &#x2724; 17:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Pseudorandom number generation looks incorrect
uniform_real_distribution is misleading. It links to a general discussion of uniform distributions, in which x is generated as a <= x <= b. But the C++ implementation provides a <= x < b, which is more in line with what programmers expect. This sent me searching for another (nonexistent) option in C++ to provide < b. I didn't change the page but I think someone may want to check this out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.32.192.41 (talk) 15:24, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

global std::begin and std::end not described
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/iterator/begin - since C++11 (accompanied with std::cbegin and std::cend in C++14) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asashnov (talk • contribs) 15:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)