Talk:CSS HTML Validator

Reads like an advertisement
The only contributor to the page is the software author. Entry looks biased and like a product ad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.247.184.203 (talk • contribs) 08:39, 3 November 2012‎ (UTC)

It's a description of a product which, as a licensed user, in my view is best in it's class
I have seen the product referenced in Dummies Guides and other books on Web Design where the authors saw fit to recommend it as a product that helped the user create better websites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.62.155.53 (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I am sure that it is a fine product. If it wasn't, the internet would have multiple "CSE HTML Validator sucks" comments. That's one sign of a bad product, and nobody seems to be complaining about this one. Alas, being a fine product is not enough to justify a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia articles need to meet the requirements found in WP:GNG, and this one doesn't. --Guy Macon (talk) 00:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)