Talk:Cairo Geniza

Untitled
This article is a little all over the place, could use an expert to tidy it up. zafiroblue05 | Talk 02:13, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

contradiction
It seems to me from reading the Geniza article and this one, that these documents were not intended to be exhumed and studied, much less published. Is there an explanation of how this happened? ... aa:talk 02:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * How what happened? How the genizah was found?  Dfass 04:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, not so much found, but opened, studied, published, etc. Do I misunderstand the purpose of the device? ... aa:talk 23:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * A geniza is just a place (not a device) where old documents are stored, like a synagogue attic or a basement. (Jewish religious documents are not put out in the garbage; out of respect, they are stored and sometimes buried.  So the geniza is just such a storage place.)  A geniza is "discovered" or "found" when someone decides to look through it and see whether there's anything interesting in there.  However, I agree that the article needs more about the history of this particular genizah.  I will see if I can add something. Dfass 00:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

¶ The article says that Agnes Lewis brought the Geniza to Solomon Schecter's attention in 1896, but the photo caption says Schecter was studying Geniza documents in 1895. Sussmanbern (talk) 05:35, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The documents are not especially intended NOT to be studied or published. So when they attracted academic interest there was no reason to treat them differently from any other old archive. Of course now they are now much better cared for than when they were just piled up in a loft. Johnbod (talk) 13:12, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Cairo Geniza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040415213647/http://www.tau.ac.il:80/taunews/97spring/medieval.html to http://www.tau.ac.il/taunews/97spring/medieval.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:42, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cairo Geniza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130423101355/http://www.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/news/historic-rivals-join-forces-to-save-1%2C000-years-of-jewish-history to http://www.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/news/historic-rivals-join-forces-to-save-1%2C000-years-of-jewish-history
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tau.ac.il/taunews/97spring/medieval.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Accounting subsection
It feels very dubious to me that the single subsection under "Contents and Significance" is Accounting, specifically talking about Jewish bankers. Given the amount of religious text under here, this is both not enough information, and putting off kind of antisemetic vibes. The article could really use more sections there talking about, for instance, the various rabbinical texts that were apparently found but have not been expanded on — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timmie99 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Consistency of dates
Please, see what I wrote here: Talk:List of Hebrew Bible manuscripts

George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 23:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Cleaning up and expanding
Hello - I've just created an account after noticing an error in date range of at the beginning of this article (now fixed w/refs - see [| my edit]). Other commenters have noted that the article is a little messy and some sections are underdeveloped or contradictory. 16 years ago someone suggested an expert do some tidying, and I happen to have a PhD related to this topic, so I intend to do a bit more work correcting/expanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McSmithertonson (talk • contribs) 14:09, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

McSmithertonson (talk) 14:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)