Talk:Canonbury railway station

Work in progress
"First site" on NLL template links to Canonbury railway station#History which now says nothing about it but should shortly. --SilasW (talk) 20:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC) It does now.--SilasW (talk) 21:37, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Former services
Perhaps pretty boxes for "Former services" are useful where a track has been ripped out but so to list Former services just because what was the next station has closed strikes me as being over the top. On the NLL a multitude of services have come and gone. In any case when Mildmay Park station closed the NLR was dead and gone. There is also the error, common to former service boxes that between "Preceding station" and "Following station" there is a mendacious "Disused railways".--SilasW (talk) 18:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

traction
Mention might usefully be made of how both pairs of lines are electrified but by different systems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 19:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It's not unique to this station - consider Queen's Park, Wembley Central, Harrow & Wealdstone, Bushey or Watford Junction, each of which have six tracks, four electrified at 25 kV AC overhead, the other two being 750 V DC third rail. What you need to do is to find a book or magazine which explicitly describes the electrification of this station, which can then be used as a reference per WP:V. -- Red rose64 (talk) 19:31, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

"Canonbury tube station" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Canonbury_tube_station&redirect=no Canonbury tube station] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:29, 24 December 2023 (UTC)