Talk:Cellebrite

Untitled
This reads like an advertisement, and it links to a page on the company site that is no longer there. "Cellebrite is the only company that works directly with the handset manufacturers to ensure compatibility before the latest devices are released to the public." Cyt0plas (talk) 00:54, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Cellebrite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130620170156/https://viaforensics.com/resources/white-papers/iphone-forensics/cellebrite-ufed/ to http://viaforensics.com/resources/white-papers/iphone-forensics/cellebrite-ufed/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130620170156/https://viaforensics.com/resources/white-papers/iphone-forensics/cellebrite-ufed/ to http://viaforensics.com/resources/white-papers/iphone-forensics/cellebrite-ufed/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cellebrite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110423031449/http://redtape.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/04/20/6503253-gadget-gives-cops-quick-access-to-cell-phone-data to http://redtape.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/04/20/6503253-gadget-gives-cops-quick-access-to-cell-phone-data
 * Added tag to http://cellebrite.com/retail-products/solutions/data-transfer-backup-a-restore.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120913055016/http://www.cellebrite.com/releases/1200/release_notes_1.2.0.0_June_2012.pdf to http://cellebrite.com/releases/1200/release_notes_1.2.0.0_June_2012.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:21, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

MCLU?
What is MCLU supposed to mean? Or is this a simple typo and it should read as ACLU? --84.115.204.160 (talk) 21:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Does usb cellebrite device leave backdoor ? is it safe ?
If one day police need to access my phone with cellebrite devices. Does it leave back door access later for easy access with just 4g enabled, and not direct access by usb ?

If a back door is leaved, i may destroy my phone and buy a new one.


 * Wikipedia probably isn't the place for this kind of discussion. However, if you're looking for further reading... The principle of [digital forensic integrity](Digital_forensics#Legal_considerations) demands that forensic kit like the Cellebrite UFED should not change any data on the device, or where that's not possible such changes should be minimal and possible to document. Many court systems see this as important, because otherwise a defendant could claim that the forensic process itself planted any "evidence" there. If a forensic device were used to install a backdoor, it would make it harder for a prosecutor to demonstrate that data on the device was placed there by the defendant: the defendant could try to claim that the backdoor placed by investigators facilitated the creation of fake evidence by either the investigators or by a third party hacker who accessed the backdoor.
 * Backdooring phones is certainly possible, but it's more the domain of espionage (where evidence collected doesn't need to stand up in court) than law enforcement. However, in some jurisdictions where there's less protection for defendants and/or a lower burden of proof placed upon the prosecution... or when there's no better option to effect a prosecution... it's not inconceivable that investigators might consider backdooring. --Avapoet (talk) 15:10, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Backdooring phones is certainly possible, but it's more the domain of espionage (where evidence collected doesn't need to stand up in court) than law enforcement. However, in some jurisdictions where there's less protection for defendants and/or a lower burden of proof placed upon the prosecution... or when there's no better option to effect a prosecution... it's not inconceivable that investigators might consider backdooring. --Avapoet (talk) 15:10, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Cellebrite UFED into Cellebrite
There is no coverage stating that product itself is notable.  scope_creep Talk  13:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * No activity on this in ~5 months. Going ahead and closing this out without a merge. Appears to have some more recent coverage with Ukraine, and other news regarding the controversy of privacy with the tool , . Article's need some work, but subject grossly appears to have notability.Bgv. (talk) 20:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Copyvio report showed 37.5% similarity, but it is arguably a small amount of prose and it is covered by NFCC..

— 3PPYB6 — T ALK — C ONTRIBS  — 01:06, 21 June 2022 (UTC)