Talk:Charismatic Episcopal Church

Latest Edits
I've read through and edited the entire article for accuracy and (in some places) style. While some of the negative point of view content is unnecessary for a short article, included by detractors simply to embarrass and give a false or confusing first impression, particularly the mention of Archbishop Spruit's wife as a co-consecrator of Timothy Barker, it's useless to edit these parts out and these details are part and parcel of the story, no matter how ephemeral to where the CEC has, in fact, ended up. That particular episode illustrates how little the CEC founder's (they were Charismatics, all) knew about the religious world they were entering, but doesn't excuse their lack of research and care. The mention of a woman co-consecrator reveals nothing about what the CEC has become, but it does point up a serious early error, one that caused problems for years, and by remembering this (and other mistakes), keeping them in the forefront of our minds, we might hope to avoid similar errors in the future. Kenneth Tanner (talk) 00:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Anonymity
Anonymity in life, including life on the internet, is inconsistent with Christian belief and practice, for the Christian God discloses himself completely in Jesus Christ and his gospel is public truth. When we "hide" our persona, temptation is nearby. It seems to me that anonymity has no business in the editing of a publicly-available document that is peer-reviewed and strives to be accurate. Kenneth Tanner (talk) 06:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 11:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Charismatic Episcopal Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061015030023/http://www.iccec.org/whowerare/index.html to http://www.iccec.org/whowerare/index.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604124025/http://www.iccec.org/hob/Summary_Patriarchs_Council_Spring_2007.pdf to http://www.iccec.org/hob/Summary_Patriarchs_Council_Spring_2007.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131105195543/http://cechome.com/ChurchHTML.aspx?t=USA to http://cechome.com/ChurchHTML.aspx?t=USA

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

What allegations?
What are the allegations that caused 30% or more to leave? They must be very serious. Was money stolen? Was it sexual? Were there organization shenanigans? Was there a theological dispute? The allegations need to be mentioned otherwise the article is seriously lacking and such a lack suggests a cover-up, which would violate neutral point of view. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 17:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC)