Talk:Chinese social relations

Merge Guanxi?

 * Well, guanxi appears now in the new version of Oxford Dictionary. We should see its significances in showing the special interpersonal relationship in the Chinese society. I don't prefer a merge here -- Jerry Crimson Mann 06:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I also object the merge proposal. If it's appearing in a dictionary with reputation, it's not even necessary to italicise the term. (The relevant edits by user:Alanmak were .) &mdash; Instantnood 08:36, 28 February 2006 (UTC) (modified 17:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC))
 * DON'T MERGE. This is a word that is increasing in usage to describe more than simply a subset of "Chinese social relations". --Shannonr 04:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Note that the "merge" issue appears settled, with guanxi staying where it is. --Shannonr 11:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Support: I'd like to bring this back up - this article should absolutely be deleted or merged with gaunxi. Chinese social relations, or shehuiguanxi, are adequately described in the "In a personal context" of the guanxi article. This stub provides no additional information on the topic. Additionally, it doesn't really make sense to read about shehuiguanxi without considering the broader concept of guanxi. 李艾连 (talk) 23:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)