Talk:Christian Cultural Center

Move?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Unnecessary title disambiguation as the ambiguous title redirects to the title with the disambiguator. Also, there are no other pages currently on the English Wikipedia named "Christian Cultural Center," so it is simply unnecessary for this article's title to include the disambiguator "Brooklyn". Steel1943 (talk) 02:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * There are many establishments across the world that could be described as a Christian cultural center or centre. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:46, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * What you seem to be referring to is some sort of generic term in regards to what someone might refer to their cultural center. Since all of the words in this title are capital, the title should refer to a place/company that is specifically named as such: at the present time, as I had stated in the previous note, there are currently no other articles on Wikipedia that have the name "Christian Cultural Center" (or Centre). This move should be a task to remove necessary disambiguation to this article's title. This article was moved from Christian Cultural Center back in 2010 for "creating a disambiguation page": this disambiguation page was never created.  Steel1943  (talk) 07:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose - Christian Cultural Center should likely be developed into an article on Christian Cultural Centers...this article, the Brooklyn congregation using the name, doesn't pass my reading of the notability test and would be a great AFD candidate. Maybe it's just the lack of in depth sources (on NYT article isn't sufficient coverage, IMHO), or the stubbiness of this article.--ColonelHenry (talk) 08:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Get to work then. Otherwise, it's just crystal ball gazing.  Personally, I don't even know what a "Christian cultural center/re" in the generic sense is, but if such an article was created it would be called christian cultural center (lowercase). —  AjaxSmack   16:35, 15 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Discussion opened by IP editor at WP:Christianity noticeboard but I would lean Support (AfD-worthiness of subject article notwithstanding) unless discussion reveals existence of actual (notable) institutions which refer to themselves as such, or significant coverage which uses this as a general term. Roberticus  talk  14:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC) a close e


 * Support for procedural reasons (to revert to the original title) and on the merits (unnecessary disambiguation). According to most interpretations of Wikipedia policy, Christian Cultural Center (proper name) and christian cultural center (common name) can exist simultaneously so any potential future article should not prevent this move.  —  AjaxSmack   16:35, 15 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose - agree with Colonel Henry. And would support AFD - ie, notability has not been established; only two sources cited (one being the organization's own website) in an article existing for 7 years; most of the article's text is about the pastor, not the organization. Dezastru (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://cccinfo.org/aboutus. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:58, 30 September 2015 (UTC)